Teams

Luv Luv Kiss Kiss

Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women DelChes - Tues

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-09vs Sets and the CityLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeanine Ranaudo / Barbara Davidson vs Rebecca Haber / Athena Huss6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesLynne Spangler vs Jessica Garz3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Hauser / Cathy Gabrielsen vs Diana Chang / LaVern Brown3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-02vs Double TroubleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeanine Ranaudo / Karen Murray vs Amy Cohen / Maria Ramirez2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCathy Gabrielsen vs Lisa Genet1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSonia Shao / Lynne Spangler vs Lucy Qiu / Stacy Rosen2-6, 5-4, 0-1
2026-05-19vs Cynwyd Rising RacquetsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeanine Ranaudo / Jennifer Durkan vs Ivana Byler / Kat Connolly1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLynne Spangler / Cathy Gabrielsen vs Maxine Weber / Kyra McGrath6-4, 6-2
2026-05-12vs LobstersLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Durkan / Kristi Turley vs Angela Scott / Suzanne Grega Murphy2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLynne Spangler vs Karin Hellberg1-6, 0-6
2026-05-05vs HPTA AD-INSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Durkan / Kristi Turley vs Joy Minnick / Jenna Mersky0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Gabrielsen / Sonia Shao vs Sari Fisher / Erika Kaufman6-1, 6-1
2026-04-28vs Drop Shots - WellsLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Davidson / Jennifer Durkan vs Alexandra Hindle / Lauren Rudolf1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCathy Gabrielsen vs Annie Dean0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Murray / Kristi Turley vs Alison Bowers / Kate Zapiec2-6, 2-6
2026-04-21vs Sets and the CityLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Davidson / Jennifer Durkan vs Jenna Zalut / Margaret Snyder6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCathy Gabrielsen vs Athena Huss1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristi Turley / Sonia Shao vs Diana Chang / LaVern Brown2-6, 4-6
2026-04-14vs AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeanine Ranaudo / Meredith Hans Moore vs Megan Hand / Annie Lee7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCathy Gabrielsen vs Kelly Snyder2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJennifer Durkan / Kristi Turley vs Courtney Leonard / Kelly Pacitti6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 2.5 Women DelChes - Tues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cup 10 Ballers0631530195
2Waynesborough 2.5 18+0714717158
3BCRC Bad Aces0791224193
4Drop Shots - Wells0818615154
5Sets and the City08131125206
6Drop Shots - Korson08121227191
7Lob'em and Leave'em08111328218
8Baby got BACKHAND08121228219
9Cynwyd Rising Racquets08111330192
10HPTA AD-IN0891531211
11Lemon Drop Shots08101431220
12Luv Luv Kiss Kiss0851939256
13St Albans Wise Aces0918924230
14Stingers09101734240
15The Racquettes0991837245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Diane Hauser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Barbara Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Kristi Turley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.13
Jeanine Ranaudo
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #4 Doubles 43% · published
2.13
Cathy Gabrielsen
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.05
Sonia Shao
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
1.93
Jennifer Durkan
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
1.88
Lynne Spangler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Karen Murray
published
Meredith Hans Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Durkan + Kristi Turley5547% games−6.5% vs expected
Jeanine Ranaudo + Meredith Hans Moore4350% games−7.4% vs expected
Diane Hauser + Lynne Spangler044 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Davidson + Jennifer Durkan224 matchesnot enough data
Jeanine Ranaudo + Karen Murray123 matchesnot enough data
Jeanine Ranaudo + Barbara Davidson213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Murray + Jennifer Durkan033 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Davidson + Kristi Turley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Diane Hauser
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Barbara Davidson
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Kristi Turley
10W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Jeanine Ranaudo
21W–42L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Cathy Gabrielsen
3W–7L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Sonia Shao
3W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Jennifer Durkan
10W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Lynne Spangler
2W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Karen Murray
4W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Meredith Hans Moore
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.