Teams

Sa.Overholser40S

2024 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-07-27Won 20
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKathryn Shields vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-20vs La.McRee40SWon 10
W#3 SinglesAnn Garey vs Lanier McRee6-1, 6-1
2024-07-13vs Da.Rusnak40SLost 01
L#3 SinglesAnn Garey vs Sarah Kingery6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2024-07-06vs He.McCann40SWon 10
W#3 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Heidi McCann6-0, 6-0
2024-06-29vs Je.Wolborsky40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Bladen Leippe6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMary Zimardo vs Julie Newson6-0, 6-0
2024-06-25Won 10
W#2 SinglesMary Zimardo vs Megan Julich6-1, 6-1
2024-06-15vs La.McRee40SWon 20
W#2 SinglesAnn Garey vs Taqiyya Yasin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMary Zimardo vs Molly Kuefel6-0, 6-0
2024-06-08vs Da.Rusnak40SLost 01
L#3 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Ashley Lindeman5-7, 6-7
2024-06-01vs He.McCann40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Jeannette Walker6-2, 7-6
L#2 SinglesAnn Garey vs Amy Cuni6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCayt Kirkman vs Maureen Doherty6-1, 6-1
2024-05-31vs Je.Wolborsky40SWon 10
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Lora Barnett6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
3.56
Mary Zimardo
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Sarah Overholser
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Cayt Kirkman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.84
Dana Aderhold
published 3
2.77
Ann Garey
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.77
Kathryn Shields
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.65
Emily Boyer
published 3
Jerri Lemanski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Shields + Mary Zimardo5073% gamesnot enough data
Cayt Kirkman + Kathryn Shields303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Ann Gonella
20W–15L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Mary Zimardo
116W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Sarah Overholser
123W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Cayt Kirkman
75W–61L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Dana Aderhold
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Ann Garey
94W–72L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Kathryn Shields
88W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Emily Boyer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Jerri Lemanski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.