Teams

SHARON HTS CC CW8.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 8.5

25 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-30vs GUNN HS CW8.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesShelley Meyer / Leslie Airola-Murveit vs Kristin Ostby / Reid Myers6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSofia Valla / Christina Bird vs Haruko Kurata / Liza Hausman6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElisabetta Gaiani / Harriet Ragozin vs Lynn Mickleburgh / Stephannie Lobell6-4, 6-4
2025-10-26vs GUNN HS CW8.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesShelley Meyer / Carrie Friedberg vs Karen Cannon / Liza Hausman2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStefanie Bray / Jillian Gee vs Reid Myers / Jennifer Seto6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Bird / Gina Jorasch vs Lynn Mickleburgh / Laura French5-7, 4-6
2025-09-21vs MENLO ATHERTON HS CW8.5ALost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Kaneko / Laurie Selover vs Hanh Luong / Jennifer Fong3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Wickers / Chandler Wickers vs Harriet Ragozin / Julie Colwell0-6, 4-6
2025-09-13vs MILLER PK CW8.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Selover / Heather Burnham vs Laura Newby / Tracy Quilala2-6, 3-6
2025-09-06vs RINCONADA PK CW8.5DLost 12
L#1 DoublesShelley Meyer / Leslie Airola-Murveit vs Lisa Liang / Debbie Hung2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Williams / Christina Bird vs Suzanne Jochner / Reina Rampell6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStefanie Bray / Karen Giordano vs Esther Chen / Vanessa Graciano7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-06vs WALNUT COUNTRY HOA CW8.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesJillian Gee / Sally McKay vs Cecile Chenevey / Kelly Saenz6-1, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Leslie Airola-Murveit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Carrie Friedberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Lynette van Dell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.21
Mia Banks
published
4.16
Tracy Cowperthwaite
published
4.07
Sabrina Ishimatsu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Elisabetta Gaiani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Amy Sendil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Stefanie Bray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.03
Donna Kaneko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Anja Brau
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Christina Bird
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Shelley Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Carolyn Arkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Elizabeth Wolfe
published 4
3.75
Gina Jorasch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Claire Toffey
published 4
3.64
Jillian Gee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Jennifer Skarakis
published
3.57
Laurie Selover
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Sally Fong
published
3.47
Lauren Denenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Teri Parekh
published
Karen Wickers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Straube
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jillian Gee + Claire Toffey4452% games+0.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Wolfe + Jennifer Skarakis3248% games−4.7% vs expected
Teri Parekh + Jillian Gee033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Airola-Murveit
14W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Carrie Friedberg
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Lynette van Dell
3W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.21
Mia Banks
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.21
Tracy Cowperthwaite
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
4.16
Sabrina Ishimatsu
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Elisabetta Gaiani
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
4.5
Amy Sendil
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
Stefanie Bray
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.04
4.5
Donna Kaneko
9W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Anja Brau
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
4.00
4
Christina Bird
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Shelley Meyer
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Carolyn Arkin
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Elizabeth Wolfe
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Gina Jorasch
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Claire Toffey
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Jillian Gee
26W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.64
Jennifer Skarakis
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Laurie Selover
8W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Sally Fong
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Lauren Denenberg
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Teri Parekh
51W–79L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.29
Karen Wickers
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Terri Straube
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.