Teams

Ferrer

2019 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Sarah Ferrer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Tarynn Berkman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.29
Trina Newcomb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Ferrer / Megan McCarter vs Jennifer Lucas / Danielle Barrett6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2019-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Ferrer / Megan McCarter vs Heidi Kjos / Elizabeth Wedan6-1, 6-1
2019-08-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Ferrer / Megan McCarter vs Donna Baxter / Heidi Kjos6-2, 6-2
2019-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesTarynn Berkman / Sarah Ferrer vs Jill Huffman / Kathy Ramsey6-2, 6-2
2019-07-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Ferrer / Megan McCarter vs Marian Sy Shamon / Garrene Mcgale6-3, 6-4
2019-07-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Ferrer / Megan McCarter vs Deanna McKay / Stephnie Bonn6-2, 6-2
2019-06-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesTarynn Berkman / Megan McCarter vs Jill Huffman / Kathy Ramsey6-2, 7-5
2019-06-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesTarynn Berkman / Trina Newcomb vs Lia Irvin / Janet Lee6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Sarah Ferrer
145W–57L career
1%99%0%
4.13
4.5
Tarynn Berkman
78W–28L career
7%93%0%
4.05
3.5
Trina Newcomb
79W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.29

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.