Teams

Talbot/18/DivI/BOC

2022 BR Tri-Level 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5,3.0,2.5 BR (18&O) Women Night

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5,3.0,2.5 BR (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Diana Roman
published 4
3.36
Holly Clark
published 3.5
Emily Kline
published 3.5
3.21
3.20
Carmen Lavergne
published 3.5
3.13
Patricia Duvic
published
3.12
Hallie Anderson
published 3
2.55
Sarah Balladares
published
2.51
LISA SIMPSON
published
2.28
Mollie Carby
published
2.25
Rhonda Loy
published
2.05
Andi Kirkpatrick
published 2.5
Kaleigh Redhead
published
Natalie Gaines
published
Natasha Engle
published
Nicole Scalise
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Clark + Patricia Brignac Talbot4156% games−1.1% vs expected
Natalie Gaines + Tiffany Wesley Ardoin303 matchesnot enough data
Holly Clark + Tiffany Wesley Ardoin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Roman
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Holly Clark
19W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Emily Kline
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Brignac Talbot
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Carmen Lavergne
70W–44L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Patricia Duvic
62W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.13
Tiffany Wesley Ardoin
21W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Hallie Anderson
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Balladares
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
LISA SIMPSON
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.51
Mollie Carby
16W–29L career · no lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.28
Rhonda Loy
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Andi Kirkpatrick
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Kaleigh Redhead
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Natalie Gaines
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Natasha Engle
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Scalise
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.