Teams

BROADSTONE RC CM8.5A

2023 COMBO · Men 8.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-11-03vs RIO DEL ORO CM8.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Sebba / Diego Arce vs Matthew Ryan / Roland Reese2-6, 6-7
2023-11-01vs RIO DEL ORO CM8.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Andorf / David Sebba vs Keeler Karwin / Adam Schmidt6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-16vs HAL BARTHOLOMEW PK CM8.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesMarc Hammonds / David Sebba vs Gilbert Larot / Jasper Golingho3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Paul Buckle
published
4.26
Mark Obrochta
published
4.25
Diego Arce
published 4.5
4.08
Pete Beam
published
4.02
David Sebba
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.94
John Sedar
published
3.93
Loredo Lawsin
published
3.81
Mark Andorf
published
3.78
William Bunce
published
Darin Carlsen
published 4
3.75
Michael Dozier
published
3.64
Marc Hammonds
published
3.44
Eric Roscoe
published
3.34
John Andorf
published
Greg Violette
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pete Beam + Mark Obrochta6260% games−1.9% vs expected
Michael Dozier + William Bunce213 matchesnot enough data
Paul Buckle + John Sedar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Buckle
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
4.34
Mark Obrochta
27W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Diego Arce
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
Pete Beam
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.08
4.5
David Sebba
85W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
John Sedar
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.94
Loredo Lawsin
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.93
Mark Andorf
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
William Bunce
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Darin Carlsen
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Dozier
34W–30L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Marc Hammonds
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
Eric Roscoe
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.44
John Andorf
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
Greg Violette
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.