Teams

GEPTA/Melendez/18&over /3.0M/WC

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-11-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesEugenio Cazares Herrera / Carlos Zamora vs Alberto Batalla / David Thurman6-3, 6-1
2023-11-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesPedro Ibarra vs Zachary Broome6-0, 6-3
2023-11-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesPedro Ibarra / Omar Ramirez vs Roman Hernandez / Kevin Woodson7-5, 6-1
2023-10-29Won 10
W#2 SinglesPedro Ibarra vs Matthew Niland6-2, 6-2
2023-10-21Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEugenio Cazares Herrera / Daniel Montoya vs Alberto Batalla / David Thurman3-6, 6-7
2023-10-08vs GEPTA-3.0-Adult/M(Chavez)(EPTC#3)Won 20
W#1 DoublesEugenio Cazares Herrera / Carlos Zamora vs Raul Santillan / Omar Varela6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPedro Ibarra / LARRY MELENDEZ vs Efren Becerra / Rene Ornelas6-3, 6-0
2023-09-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesLARRY MELENDEZ / Eugenio Cazares Herrera vs Daniel Gallatin / Ralph Rasura6-4, 6-4
2023-09-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesPedro Ibarra / Daniel Montoya vs Collins Preston / Juan Taveras6-0, 6-2
2023-09-10Lost 01
L#2 SinglesPedro Ibarra vs Omar Pineda1-6, 5-7
2023-08-28Won 20
W#1 DoublesPedro Ibarra / Esteban Sandoval vs Matthew Niland / Edgar Borrego6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEugenio Cazares Herrera / Gabriel Soto vs Ricardo Kosturakis / Justin Lane4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Melendez/18&over /3.0M/WC111461431364
2GEPTA-3.0-Adult/M(Ferris)(EPTC#2)102431743438
3GEPTA-3.0-Adult/M(Hernandez)(FB)56262965497
4GEPTA-3.0-Adult/M(Montelongo)(EPTC#1)57283272531
5GEPTA-3.0-Adult/M(Chavez)(EPTC#3)46222859481
6GEPTA-3.0-Adult/M(Overly)(EPCC)38213471508

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Carlos Zamora
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
Daniel Montoya
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Eduardo Velazco
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Esteban Sandoval
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Eugenio Cazares Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
GUADALUPE CAZARES
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Gabriel Soto
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Gerardo Martinez
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Juan Carlos Vazquez Talamantes
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Julio Marquez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
LARRY MELENDEZ
usually #3 Doubles 32%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Omar Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Pedro Ibarra
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriel Soto + LARRY MELENDEZ5451% gamesnot enough data
Gerardo Martinez + Omar Ramirez404 matchesnot enough data
LARRY MELENDEZ + Carlos Zamora213 matchesnot enough data
LARRY MELENDEZ + Julio Marquez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carlos Zamora
26W–4L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3
Daniel Montoya
9W–9L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
Eduardo Velazco
4W–4L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Esteban Sandoval
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Eugenio Cazares Herrera
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
GUADALUPE CAZARES
9W–7L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gabriel Soto
39W–42L career · 30 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gerardo Martinez
21W–12L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Juan Carlos Vazquez Talamantes
8W–4L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julio Marquez
12W–4L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
LARRY MELENDEZ
34W–23L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Omar Ramirez
12W–7L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Pedro Ibarra
20W–10L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.