Teams

Roman/18/7.5/CWD/BOC

2025 BR Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 7.5 BR (18&O) Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.93 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-07vs Lewis/18/7.5/CWD/BRCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndree Padial / Hannah Wallace vs Tammy Noonan / Lindsay Perque1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLesley Halphen / Suzanne Edmonson vs Kaleigh Porcelli / Rebecca Harrod2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-26vs Tranchina/18/7.5/CWD/BOCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Silvey / Hannah Wallace vs Lisa Scalise / Heather Jayson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesClaesi Mccrary / Courtney McGraw vs Jayne Anderson / Liz McCarthy6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHeather Bush / Suzanne Edmonson vs Lee Anne Tranchina / Kristan Fletcher6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-18vs Lewis/18/7.5/CWD/BRCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Edmonson / Heidi Smith vs Jamie Lewis / Tammy Noonan1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Silvey / Stacy Hebert vs Sarah Uhl / Kathryn Baker3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHannah Wallace / Kimberly Heroman vs Rebecca Harrod / Kaleigh Porcelli3-6, 6-7
2025-09-15vs Tranchina/18/7.5/CWD/BOCLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Bush / Cindy Barksdale vs Lisa Scalise / Liz McCarthy3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney McGraw / Holly Clark vs Shannon Hattier / Kristan Fletcher6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-08vs Lewis/18/7.5/CWD/BRCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCourtney McGraw / Claesi Mccrary vs Kaleigh Porcelli / Kathryn Baker3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesHeather Bush / Kimberly Heroman vs KATIE KURZ / Kasey Eglin3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacy Hebert / Suzanne Edmonson vs Tammy Noonan / Lindsay Perque5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-01vs Tranchina/18/7.5/CWD/BOCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Edmonson / Lesley Halphen vs Krista Andry / Kristan Fletcher6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCourtney McGraw / Claesi Mccrary vs Lisa Scalise / Heather Jayson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndree Padial / Hannah Wallace vs Lee Anne Tranchina / Liz McCarthy3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 BR (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Andree Padial
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.91
Courtney McGraw
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Suzanne Edmonson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Diana Roman
published 4
3.74
Cindy Barksdale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Amanda Silvey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Leigh Ann Texada
published
3.61
Kimberly Heroman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
3.56
Susan Doherty
published
3.52
Claesi Mccrary
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Hannah Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.39
Heidi Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Holly Clark
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Stacy Hebert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Heather Bush
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Lesley Halphen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney McGraw + Andree Padial6073% games+17.6% vs expected
Courtney McGraw + Claesi Mccrary5355% games+5.5% vs expected
Heidi Smith + Stacy Hebert314 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Barksdale + Andree Padial303 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Edmonson + Lesley Halphen213 matchesnot enough data
Andree Padial + Hannah Wallace123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andree Padial
53W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Courtney McGraw
31W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.91
Suzanne Edmonson
42W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Diana Roman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Cindy Barksdale
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Amanda Silvey
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Leigh Ann Texada
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Kimberly Heroman
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Colleen Schneller
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Susan Doherty
42W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Claesi Mccrary
29W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Hannah Wallace
26W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Heidi Smith
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Holly Clark
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Stacy Hebert
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Heather Bush
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Lesley Halphen
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.