Teams

GJTC KALLEN

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - WS

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-20vs GJTC MBARNHURSTLost 02
L#1 SinglesGisela Ferguson vs Stephanie Rush3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Bauer / Jackie Stouffer vs Jeena Jolley / Val Kennedy3-6, 5-7
2024-05-13vs GJTC SERBLost 01
L#2 DoublesJackie Stouffer / Kathleen Hughes vs Marilyn Hall / Cynthia Mill5-7, 4-6
2024-05-06vs GJTC TRANIVOMBOAHANGYWon 20
W#1 SinglesGisela Ferguson vs Tinarivo Ranivomboahangy1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Aiken / Jackie Stouffer vs Sharon Reiner / Ramona McKenzie6-0, 6-1
2024-04-29vs GJTC MBARNHURSTLost 02
L#1 SinglesGisela Ferguson vs Megan Barnhurst3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Hughes / Jackie Stouffer vs Dana Lee Dunn / Jeena Jolley3-6, 3-6
2024-04-25vs GJTC TRANIVOMBOAHANGYSplit 11
W#2 SinglesGisela Ferguson vs Jordan Preuss7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMelody Charles / Jackie Stouffer vs Holly Smith / Jennifer Watson6-7, 3-6
2024-04-08vs GJTC MBARNHURSTWon 20
W#1 SinglesGisela Ferguson vs Stephanie Rush6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Bauer / Jackie Stouffer vs Amy Stegelmeier / Jill Harmon4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-01vs GJTC SERBWon 20
W#1 SinglesGisela Ferguson vs Elise Prinster6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRachel Aiken / Jackie Stouffer vs Sandra Weckerly / Amber Maurer7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Rachel Aiken
published
3.30
Stacie Dix
published
3.27
Lauren Bleil
published
3.20
Jackie Stouffer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.16
Gisela Ferguson
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.12
Karin Cook
published
3.08
Kathleen Hughes
published
2.98
Andrea Bauer
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Dix + Kathleen Hughes3347% games+0.5% vs expected
Kathleen Hughes + Karin Cook2440% gamesnot enough data
Stacie Dix + Karin Cook213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Aiken
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Stacie Dix
23W–23L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Lauren Bleil
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Jackie Stouffer
77W–114L career · 7 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Gisela Ferguson
25W–36L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Karin Cook
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.12
Kathleen Hughes
16W–26L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.08
3
Andrea Bauer
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.