Teams

HadaFew 8.5

2025 COMBO · 8.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.43 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-13vs Nationals BanditsWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristopher West / Quillan Harris vs Mark Gitter / Adam Gitter7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRichard de Jesus / Hsiao-Hsuan Li vs Jason Finley / Troy Bolton II6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndrew Alarid / Todd Spears vs Adam Rodriguez / Chris Robinson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-12vs Thai TopazWon 30
W#1 DoublesEstevan San Miguel / Hsiao-Hsuan Li vs Randy Myers / David Thanairongroj6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrew Alarid / Quillan Harris vs Bobby Palmer / Marvin Hsie6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPJ Pfeiffer / Ryan Cruthirds vs Luke Danielson / Rene Candelaria6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Travis Burns
published
4.43
Estevan San Miguel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.42
PJ Pfeiffer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.41
Andrew Alarid
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.37
Alton Ortiz
published 4.5
4.37
Andy Murillo
published 4.5
4.32
Richard de Jesus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Chris Mireles
published 4.5
Hsiao-Hsuan Li
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Ryan Cruthirds
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Jeremy Carr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.91
Todd Spears
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Coffey
published 4
Quillan Harris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Murillo + Travis Burns404 matchesnot enough data
Andy Murillo + Andrew Alarid314 matchesnot enough data
Alton Ortiz + Travis Burns303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Travis Burns
23W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
4.65
4.5
Estevan San Miguel
23W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%28%
4.43
PJ Pfeiffer
19W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Andrew Alarid
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Alton Ortiz
21W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Andy Murillo
27W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
4.37
Richard de Jesus
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Chris Mireles
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Hsiao-Hsuan Li
12W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Cruthirds
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.04
Jeremy Carr
35W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
Todd Spears
44W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Daniel Coffey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Quillan Harris
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.