Teams

Bilstrom/Bernhardt

2019 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Shannon Bilstrom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Lori Bernhardt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2019-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShannon Bilstrom / Lori Bernhardt vs Sheila Anderson / Shannon Roarke2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2019-08-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Bernhardt / Shannon Bilstrom vs Melissa Light / Diane Middlebrooks7-6, 7-6
2019-07-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesLori Bernhardt / Shannon Bilstrom vs Sheila Anderson / Shannon Roarke4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-07-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Bernhardt / Shannon Bilstrom vs Leslie OBrien / Amy Murphy6-4, 6-2
2019-06-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Bernhardt / Shannon Bilstrom vs Erica Tsuruta / Chizuru Watanabe7-6, 6-4
2019-06-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesLori Bernhardt / Shannon Bilstrom vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Brooke Moffenbeier6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2019-06-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesLori Bernhardt / Shannon Bilstrom vs Nancy Atkins / Julia Karlin7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2019-06-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesLori Bernhardt / Shannon Bilstrom vs Angie Lee / Seungja Shin6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Shannon Bilstrom
13W–21L career
not enough data
4
Lori Bernhardt
28W–38L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.