Teams

Smiles and Laughs 55+7.0

2025 Montgomery Adult 55 & Over · Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-21vs I'd Hit That 55+ 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesShiqiang Li / Yuhong Wen vs Murugavel Chengalvarayan / John Batu6-1, 6-4
2025-06-10vs Defenders 55+ 7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesYunkai Yu / Yuhong Wen vs Majed Hamawy / Jim Leveque7-6, 2-1
W#3 DoublesYunbing Huang / Lei Fu vs Hugo Frega / Shawn Drury6-3, 6-1
2025-06-03vs I'd Hit That 55+ 7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesYi Zhang / Yunbing Huang vs Robert Seidel / Greg Koch6-4, 7-5
2025-05-27vs String Theory 55+ 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesYi Zhang / Yunbing Huang vs Volker Englisch / Gerald McClellan6-2, 6-1
2025-05-21vs Defenders 55+ 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesYunkai Yu / Yuhong Wen vs Majed Hamawy / Jim Leveque5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-17vs I'd Hit That 55+ 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesYuhong Wen / Wei Yang vs John Batu / Daniel Mansfield6-2, 6-0
2025-05-02vs I'd Hit That 55+ 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesShiqiang Li / Yuhong Wen vs Carlos Raul Jimenez / Robert Seidel6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Yuhong Wen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Jianping Xu
published
3.54
Lei Fu
published
3.43
Yunbing Huang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
John Zhong
published
3.39
Jian Liu
published
3.28
Wei Huang
published
Eric Zhou
published 3.5
3.13
Jay Colella
published
Shiqiang Li
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Colella + Wei Huang1637% games−7.8% vs expected
Jay Colella + Jian Liu224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yuhong Wen
77W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Jianping Xu
21W–12L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Lei Fu
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Yunbing Huang
51W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.43
John Zhong
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jian Liu
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.39
Wei Huang
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Eric Zhou
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Colella
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Shiqiang Li
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.