Teams

Ch.Higgins40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-07vs El.Copeland40CWon 10
W#2 DoublesChunhui Higgins / Sarah Shelby vs Danielle Wilder / Terry Dale6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-04vs El.Copeland40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Bauman / Chunhui Higgins vs Laura Weygandt / Maureen Sredl7-6, 6-1
2024-09-23vs El.Copeland40CLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Shelby / Stacey Burkert vs Danielle Wilder / Barbara Timinskas2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVirginia Dirschl / Chunhui Higgins vs Erin Rankin / Emily Culbreth7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura McNiven / Leah Weinberger vs Elizabeth Copeland / Laura Weygandt4-6, 4-6
2024-09-09vs El.Copeland40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Leah Weinberger vs Elizabeth Copeland / Emily Culbreth7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRachel Davis / Chunhui Higgins vs Tanya Parise / Laura Hiller0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesStacey Burkert / Leigh Mullins vs Erin Rankin / Mary Money6-2, 7-5
2024-08-26vs El.Copeland40CSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRochelle Grieco / Nannette Goodwin vs Heather Remley / Kristal Nelson1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaura McNiven / Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo vs Erin Rankin / Mary Money0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-19vs El.Copeland40CLost 12
L#1 DoublesXimena Ordonez-Acevedo / Laura McNiven vs Jane Britt / Tanya Parise1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Pack / Mary Prabel vs Erin Rankin / Laura Hiller6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacey Burkert / Rochelle Grieco vs Laura Weygandt / Elizabeth Copeland3-6, 1-6
2024-08-12vs El.Copeland40CLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Davis / Laura McNiven vs Danielle Wilder / Terry Dale6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVirginia Dirschl / Leah Weinberger vs Elizabeth Copeland / Emily Culbreth6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRochelle Grieco / Sandy Wood vs Maureen Sredl / Barbara Timinskas1-6, 0-6
2024-08-05vs El.Copeland40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Leah Weinberger vs Heather Remley / Kristal Nelson1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Virginia Dirschl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Leigh Mullins
published
4.02
Nancy Pack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Donna Bauman
published
3.93
Chunhui Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.91
Stacey Burkert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Laura McNiven
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.88
Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Nannette Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Leah Weinberger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Sarah Shelby
published
3.57
Sandy Wood
published
3.41
Rochelle Grieco
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chunhui Higgins + Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo9359% games+6.8% vs expected
Virginia Dirschl + Stacey Burkert7550% games+2.5% vs expected
Nancy Pack + Laura McNiven39962% games+1.1% vs expected
Laura McNiven + Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo6353% gamesnot enough data
Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo + Nannette Goodwin7261% gamesnot enough data
Laura McNiven + Nannette Goodwin6259% gamesnot enough data
Chunhui Higgins + Nannette Goodwin5257% gamesnot enough data
Chunhui Higgins + Laura McNiven4260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Virginia Dirschl
197W–127L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
Leigh Mullins
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Nancy Pack
295W–89L career · 1 line in 2024
43%56%<1%
4.02
Donna Bauman
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Chunhui Higgins
229W–92L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Stacey Burkert
175W–116L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Laura McNiven
352W–121L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo
169W–78L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Nannette Goodwin
313W–204L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Leah Weinberger
357W–281L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Sarah Shelby
49W–30L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Sandy Wood
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Rochelle Grieco
226W–186L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.