← Teams

Mask-a-raiders 7.0 (40+)

2021 Howard-Columbia Mixed 40 & Over · Howard Columbia Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.42 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-09-02vs MacAttack 7.0 (40+)Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesChristy Hull / Steve Hull vs Esther Wang / Alexandre Fines2-6, 2-6
2021-08-16vs Jess Do It 7.0 (40+)Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAli Kart / Brenda Poore vs Hsuan Ou / Christina Truax3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJay Guerin / Yngrid Sierra vs Kristina Leary / Surendra Babu6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-08-08vs The Fugees (40+)Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesBrenda Poore / Ali Kart vs Rebecca Stewart / Michael Vanderputten6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristy Hull / Paul DiMarco vs George Lamont / Jillian Kingwood1-6, 1-6
2021-07-26Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesPaul DiMarco / Yngrid Sierra vs Ellen Millhollon / Christopher Williams3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-07-10Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesSteve Hull / Christy Hull vs Douglas Turner / TRINA CUNNINGHAM2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-06-30vs Munshell 7.0 (40+)Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Jordan / Ethan Stryker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPaul DiMarco / Yngrid Sierra vs Cynthia Munshell / Sridhar Atluri1-6, 2-6
2021-06-22vs Vintage AlewinnersSplit 1–1
W#2 DoublesMaunank Shah / Brenda Poore vs Stanley Nazaire / Sandy Segrist6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEthan Stryker / Suzanne Rothwell vs Richard Spicer / Leslie Mansfield6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Robert Fox
published —
3.33
Faustina Smith-Neil
published 3.5
3.33
Ethan Stryker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
EnPing Wang
published 3.5
3.25
Brenda Poore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.12
Yngrid Sierra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Suzanne Rothwell
published —
2.45
Christy Hull
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ethan Stryker + Brenda Poore8–648% games−7.9% vs expected
Yngrid Sierra + Ethan Stryker4–357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Robert Fox
17W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Faustina Smith-Neil
4W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Ethan Stryker
106W–129L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
EnPing Wang
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
—
3.5
Brenda Poore
228W–199L career · 8 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Yngrid Sierra
165W–232L career · 6 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
—
Suzanne Rothwell
23W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Christy Hull
50W–98L career · 3 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.