Teams

SpringPark/Bradley W3.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Sunday · W3.5S

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-30vs Bent Tree/Wilder-Sarche W3.5SWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan Harvey / Kristi Cole vs Stacey Iorio / Nicole Russell7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJOSALYN SAMSON vs Natalie Weatherford2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDonna BELLE / Xtine Burrough vs Christy Ricketts / Allison Beal6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLeanne Freiberg / Shannon Robins vs Molly Miller / Angela Carrier7-5, 6-2
W#1 DoublesStacey Zartler / Timla Healey vs Melinda Cantu / Nicole Libby7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMARY DAMKROGER vs Annette Delbridge6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHolly Smith / Sherri Rejebian vs Greta West / Dianne Dolly Reid4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-23vs Greenhill/Chris-Ericson W3.5SWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacey Zartler / Teri Wilson vs Wendy Woodward / Margaret Cooley6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJOSALYN SAMSON vs Diamira Avila5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMARY DAMKROGER / Donna BELLE vs Jill Chris / Kimberly Senior6-4, 6-2
2025-02-22vs High Point/Mallaki W3.5SSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmber Morefield / Donna BELLE vs Kit Kwong / Courtney Vorel6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSarah Southcott vs Helen Chang5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSherri Rejebian / Timla Healey vs Noelle Ratliff / Paula Cooper2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHolly Smith / Nancy Lacey vs Luming Parsley / Jaleh Mallaki5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesStacey Zartler / Teri Wilson vs Diane Thornton / Amanda Forrest6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Southcott vs Stephanie Shah2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Harvey / Leanne Freiberg vs Brett Levy / Stephanie King4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W3.5S have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
MARY DAMKROGER
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.60
Teri Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Stacey Zartler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Amber Morefield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Amy Wandstrat
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Xtine Burrough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Donna BELLE
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Timla Healey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Sarah Southcott
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Shanna Claytor
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.09
Sherri Rejebian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Lisa Carpenter
published
2.97
JOSALYN SAMSON
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kristi Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leanne Freiberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Lacey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Robins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timla Healey + Donna BELLE8267% games+20.8% vs expected
Shanna Claytor + Amber Morefield5060% games+12.7% vs expected
Teri Wilson + Stacey Zartler12365% games+6.4% vs expected
Sherri Rejebian + Lisa Carpenter134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Wandstrat + MARY DAMKROGER314 matchesnot enough data
Teri Wilson + MARY DAMKROGER303 matchesnot enough data
Teri Wilson + Sarah Southcott213 matchesnot enough data
Timla Healey + Lisa Carpenter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MARY DAMKROGER
38W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Teri Wilson
37W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Stacey Zartler
21W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Amber Morefield
26W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Amy Wandstrat
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Xtine Burrough
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Donna BELLE
22W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Timla Healey
21W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Sarah Southcott
19W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Shanna Claytor
31W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Sherri Rejebian
4W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Lisa Carpenter
7W–21L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
JOSALYN SAMSON
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Kristi Cole
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leanne Freiberg
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Lacey
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Robins
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.