Teams

Arbelaez/Memphis

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 9.0 Men 55 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 9.0 Men 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Arbelaez/Memphis000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Stephen Mansour
published
4.15
Santiago Arbelaez
published
4.02
Dale Thompson
published 4.5
3.97
Neil Weston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Nick Longsworth
published
3.80
Paul Woods
published
John Mullen
published
Tu Pham
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Mansour
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
Santiago Arbelaez
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Dale Thompson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Neil Weston
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
Nick Longsworth
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.94
Paul Woods
9W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
John Mullen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tu Pham
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.