Teams

Pham: Valley Southwoods

NA 2024 Iowa Tri-Level League · Mixed Tri-Level 7.0-8.0-9.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.20 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-21vs Smith: Valley SouthwoodsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenn Willis / Scott Peterson vs Jeff Ditsworth / Katie Kelleher4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWillow Bauer / Brent Hanson vs Matthew Whipps / Angela Torgerson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSara Peterson / Mike Sylvester vs Nathan Johnston / Cristen Schipper6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-07-14vs Smith: Valley SouthwoodsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Hilton / Nathan Greiner vs Heather Ditsworth / Tim Paulson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSara Peterson / Scott Peterson vs Calla Whipp / Jeff Ditsworth4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Zinn-Burggraaf / Max Wilker vs Stephanie Anania / Matthew Morgan6-3, 6-1
2024-07-07vs Smith: Valley SouthwoodsWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeidi Hill-Matthes / Brent Hanson vs Siri Long / Jeff Ditsworth4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeslie Shipp / Martin Fisher Jr vs Katie Kelleher / Matthew Whipps6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Zinn-Burggraaf / Mike Sylvester vs Calla Whipp / Tony DAntuono6-4, 6-3
2024-06-30vs Smith: Valley SouthwoodsWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrent Hanson / Kim Gillum vs Brooke Melott / Jeff Ditsworth7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWillow Bauer / Ayush Jha vs Jessica Stewart / David Fautsch6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Bitner / Max Wilker vs Matthew Whipps / Stephanie Anania6-0, 6-4
2024-06-23vs Smith: Valley SouthwoodsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Zinn-Burggraaf / Mike Sylvester vs Tony DAntuono / Calla Whipp6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJenn Willis / Martin Fisher Jr vs Matthew Morgan / Katie Kelleher7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNathan Greiner / Leslie Shipp vs Rachel Morgan / Jordan Brackey6-2, 6-2
2024-06-09vs Smith: Valley SouthwoodsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNathan Greiner / Jenn Willis vs Tim Paulson / Jessica Stewart6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmanda Hilton / Ayush Jha vs Cristen Schipper / Jordan Brackey0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMax Wilker / Stephanie Bitner vs Stephanie Anania / David Fautsch2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed Tri-Level 7.0-8.0-9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Heidi Hill-Matthes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Nathan Greiner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.95
Ayush Jha
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Willow Bauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Brent Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Jenn Willis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Anne Pham
published 4
3.76
Amanda Hilton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Mike Sylvester
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Martin Fisher Jr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Stephanie Bitner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Max Wilker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Sara Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Gillum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Shipp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Scott Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Shipp + Amanda Hilton303 matchesnot enough data
Anne Pham + Amanda Hilton303 matchesnot enough data
Ayush Jha + Brent Hanson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heidi Hill-Matthes
37W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
4.17
Nathan Greiner
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
4.15
4.5
Ayush Jha
26W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.95
Willow Bauer
25W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Brent Hanson
75W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Jenn Willis
37W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Anne Pham
99W–29L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Amanda Hilton
60W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
Mike Sylvester
20W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Martin Fisher Jr
53W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Stephanie Bitner
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Max Wilker
64W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf
70W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.46
Sara Peterson
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
Kim Gillum
35W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Shipp
64W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Peterson
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.