Teams

BC-PVTC/PeterMalishka

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-11-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Chekian / Stephen Amstutz vs Kazuya Kataoka / Shingo Adachi6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-11-04vs BC-Lakewood/TonyHsuWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Chekian / Scott Nishimura vs Larry Daniels / Charles Barrantes6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-21vs BC-IndependencePark/RafaelHerreraWon 10
W#1 DoublesKurt Kredel / Andrew Chekian vs Adan Flores / German Pedraza6-1, 6-2
2023-10-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKurt Kredel / Andrew Chekian vs Eric Smith / Westley White4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Andrew Chekian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.24
Shawn Gunadi
published
4.22
Joshua Chou
published
4.19
Joseph Chou
published
4.18
Chad MacAllister
published 4.5
4.17
Kurt Kredel
published
4.11
Stephen Amstutz
published
3.86
Richard Butlig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Peter Malishka
published
Jason Sikola
published
Jerome Haig
published
Roland Rietz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Chekian + Kurt Kredel21853% games+2.2% vs expected
Shawn Gunadi + Joshua Chou213 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Chou + Joshua Chou123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Chekian
111W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
Shawn Gunadi
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
Joshua Chou
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Joseph Chou
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Chad MacAllister
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
Kurt Kredel
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
Stephen Amstutz
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.11
4
Richard Butlig
101W–49L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
Peter Malishka
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
Jason Sikola
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jerome Haig
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roland Rietz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.