← Teams

PTC-Ouellette

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Tomoko Iwata
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.53
Austin Rice-Stitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Parish Burns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Matthew Kanagandram
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.35
Michael Koch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Reiko Maeda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
May Graham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Miriam Habafy
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
John Kin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-12-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMatthew Kanagandram / Tomoko Iwata vs Xiaolin Nan / Yuxia Ouyang6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAustin Rice-Stitt / Reiko Maeda vs John Yu / Jing Li6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGavin Newcomer / May Graham vs Phillip Hyun / Qin Lian6-2, 6-3
2024-12-06Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesReiko Maeda / Matthew Kanagandram vs TRIET NGUYEN / Jane Shu3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Kin / Miriam Habafy vs Ben Howard / Michelle Vo6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAndrew Scheirer / Tomoko Iwata vs James Takahashi / Julia Bride5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesReiko Maeda / Andrew Scheirer vs Andy Murray / Morgan Towle6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Ouellette / Michael Koch vs Aluko Hope / Julie LaMontagne6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMay Graham / Matthew Kanagandram vs Anthony Tursich / Bridget Kaiel6-4, 6-4
2024-11-03Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesTomoko Iwata / Matthew Kanagandram vs Heike Droste / Gareth Harries6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMay Graham / Gavin Newcomer vs Helena Thornton / Radu Tudorache6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Andrew Scheirer vs Dayna Jahnke-Corwin / James Horen7-6, 6-3
2024-10-26Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAndrew Scheirer / Miriam Habafy vs Adriana McCord / Jody McCord6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesReiko Maeda / Michael Koch vs Amanda Wagner / Chris Simpson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Kin / May Graham vs Emily Shue / Joseph Leaptrott6-1, 6-3
2024-10-13Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMiriam Habafy / John Kin vs Kieu Lam / Vivek Mano6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesParish Burns / Michael Koch vs David Floyd / Debbie Frankel6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesReiko Maeda / Matthew Kanagandram vs Nicole Floyd / Ralf Bednarz6-3, 6-0
2024-10-05Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesParish Burns / Andrew Scheirer vs Rebecca Griffith / Chase Doudican6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMiriam Habafy / John Kin vs Nicole Floyd / David Floyd6-2, 6-1
2024-09-21Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMatthew Kanagandram / Tomoko Iwata vs Carolyn Graeper / Nolan Astrab6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAustin Rice-Stitt / Reiko Maeda vs Tommy Trakoolthai / Allison Ko1-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Tomoko Iwata
26W–11L career
0%37%63%
3.66
4
Austin Rice-Stitt
77W–49L career
26%74%0%
3.53
3.5
Parish Burns
112W–58L career
0%98%2%
3.36
3.5
Matthew Kanagandram
27W–20L career
0%97%3%
3.35
3.5
Michael Koch
49W–26L career
0%95%4%
3.35
3.5
Reiko Maeda
76W–78L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
May Graham
89W–78L career
0%99%0%
3.29
3.5
Miriam Habafy
105W–82L career
0%99%0%
3.26
3.5
John Kin
39W–36L career · type M
6%91%3%
3.25

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.