Teams

La.Kane18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-20vs Je.Sagal Solomon18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesSabrina Kane / Cathy Williams vs McGavock Edwards / Christy van Ness6-1, 6-0
2024-05-10vs Co.Haynes18ALost 01
L#3 DoublesJamie Moy / Sabrina Kane vs Erin Hemminger / Sarah Lukz6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEva Frecker vs Andrea Zhou2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-14vs Kr.Levine18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesEva Frecker / Rose Trimpey-Warhaftig vs Samantha Pickett / Courtney Kaprelian3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSabrina Kane / Julia Butler vs Melissa Proctor / Beth Farrell6-3, 6-2
2024-03-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesEva Frecker / Rachel Betzwieser vs Stephanie Gillespie / Ellen Zimmerman7-6, 6-3
2024-03-10vs Su.Braga18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesRose Trimpey-Warhaftig / Eva Frecker vs Michelle Staub / Megan Slocum6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSabrina Kane / Cathy Williams vs Cassy Albertson / Kathryn White3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-03-03Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSabrina Kane / Lauren Kane vs Caroline Boykin / Melissa Burke3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Jamie Moy
published
2.86
Shannon Sikes
published
2.86
Kasani Amore
published
2.84
Sabrina Kane
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.77
Eva Frecker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Rachel Betzwieser
published
2.38
Lauren Kane
published
2.25
Darcy Louzao
published 2.5
Julia Butler
published
Maria Riemann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sabrina Kane + Eva Frecker303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Moy
18W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Shannon Sikes
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.86
Kasani Amore
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Sabrina Kane
248W–175L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Eva Frecker
27W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.77
Rachel Betzwieser
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
Lauren Kane
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Darcy Louzao
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
Julia Butler
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Riemann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.