Teams

Miller/Conway/CTC

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 2 League · 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-30vs Smouni/LR/PVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesThomas Gault / Tony Lee vs Andrew Adkins / Brady Adkins6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesLuke Maness vs Taylor Adams6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBranden de Graff vs Brian Wayne6-3, 4-3
2026-04-27vs Overley/LR/CCLRWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichael Dry / Brandon Riley vs William Pollock / Jack Grobmyer6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLuke Maness vs Nelson McCain3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTaylor Woelfel / Justin Phillips vs Sam Carter / James Ritchie7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBranden de Graff vs Jonathan Parkey2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLawrence Roberts / Ryan Bates vs Sam Overley / Dan Parfitt6-3, 6-1
2026-04-16vs Kibbey/LR/RebsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJustin Phillips / Brandon Riley vs Paul Hruby / Tyler Bobo4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTaylor Woelfel / Jihoon Jhang vs George Rainey / Stuart Berryhill6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBranden de Graff vs Chris Halket6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLawrence Roberts / Luke Maness vs Joshua Gaines / Bud Watts6-4, 6-0
2026-04-10vs Oyos/LR/RebsLost 13
L#1 DoublesRyan Bates / Lawrence Roberts vs Phil Rampey / Ryan Allmond3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLuke Maness vs Marc McFadden4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrandon Riley / Taylor Woelfel vs Aaron Bunner / Stephen Riley6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesBranden de Graff vs Harsha Dondamury6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-24vs Francomano/Lloyd/LR/RebsWon 40
W#1 DoublesLawrence Roberts / Brandon Riley vs Colt Lloyd / Jonathan Halford6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesBranden de Graff vs Donald Deaton6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Bates / Taylor Woelfel vs Michael Brooks / Kevin Lloyd6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChord Halsted / Jihoon Jhang vs Martinez Dupree / Jamie Robinson6-1, 7-6
2026-03-17vs Francomano/Lloyd/LR/RebsWon 32
L#1 DoublesChord Halsted / Jared Todd vs David Cheek / Mike Terrell1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLawrence Roberts vs Colt Lloyd6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJihoon Jhang / Justin Phillips vs Kevin Lloyd / Erik Ostermueller6-7, 3-4
W#2 SinglesBranden de Graff vs Jonathan Halford6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Bates / Taylor Woelfel vs Michael Brooks / Martinez Dupree6-2, 6-3
2026-03-02vs Overley/LR/CCLRWon 32
L#1 DoublesMichael Dry / Thomas Gault vs Jonathan Parkey / Levent Ozdemir4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLuke Maness vs William Pollock2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLawrence Roberts / Ryan Bates vs Nelson McCain / Brian Ross7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBranden de Graff vs Dan Parfitt6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTony Lee / Chord Halsted vs Brad Howard / Justin Rabinowitz6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-19vs Oyos/LR/RebsLost 14
L#1 DoublesMichael Dry / Tony Lee vs Phil Rampey / Ryan Allmond1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBranden de Graff vs Marc McFadden1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJustin Phillips / Thomas Gault vs Andrew Kincaid / Sam Ivanovsky6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLawrence Roberts vs Harsha Dondamury7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRyan Bates / Taylor Woelfel vs Aaron Bunner / Chaitanya Korrapati6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Miller/Conway/CTC62231743343
2Francomano/Lloyd/LR/Rebs08103061423

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Wyatt Miller
published
2.95
Ryan Bates
published
2.91
Brandon Riley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Branden de Graff
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.89
Taylor Woelfel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Lawrence Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.77
Luke Maness
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.68
Chord Halsted
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Michael Dry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Jihoon Jhang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Thomas Gault
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jared Todd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wyatt Miller
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.50
Ryan Bates
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Brandon Riley
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Branden de Graff
5W–3L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Taylor Woelfel
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Lawrence Roberts
5W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Luke Maness
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Chord Halsted
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Michael Dry
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Jihoon Jhang
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Thomas Gault
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jared Todd
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.