Teams

SKY RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-15vs KC-RH GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesBob Sullivan / Kendrick McLish vs Ken Reed / David Maas7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Raval vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJody Wright / Gregory Tamkin vs John Bohan / Jim Chapel6-4, 6-1
2026-07-08vs HW GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesBob Sullivan / Doug Wiley vs Michael Gleason / Brent Lenderman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeremy Thomas / Jeffrey Raval vs Kelly Bolin / Glenn Tacke7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRockwell Pearson / Conn Flanigan vs John Miller / Richard Miranda2-6, 3-6
2026-07-01vs SS-H BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKendrick McLish / Rockwell Pearson vs Kenneth Theobald / Kevin Lash6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBob Sullivan / Jeremy Thomas vs David Burdick / Jon Johnson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesConn Flanigan / Greg Rogers vs Bob Gamble / Jack Hailey6-0, 6-2
2026-06-24vs EM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesBob Sullivan / Doug Wiley vs David Ekedahl / Thomas Toth6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Raval vs Pat Sullivan3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeremy Thomas / Rockwell Pearson vs Gregory Fritsch / John Esbenshade6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBlake Johnson / Greg Rogers vs Daniel Moe / Hayes Trotter6-1, 6-1
2026-06-17vs KC-CC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesBob Sullivan / Rockwell Pearson vs Chris Kelly / Victor Nehf1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesConn Flanigan / Greg Rogers vs Gary Anderson / Aaron Burns4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGregory Tamkin / Jody Wright vs Robert Kelly / Scott Ethridge4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-10vs KC-RH GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesJeremy Thomas / Kendrick McLish vs Greg Arend / Ken Reed6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesPaul von Glumer vs Jeffrey Jones4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBlake Johnson / Rockwell Pearson vs Jim Chapel / David Maas6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBob Sullivan / Jody Wright vs Thomas Pott / Ron Lamberson6-3, 6-1
2026-06-03vs HW GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesBob Sullivan / Jody Wright vs Andy Silverman / Michael Gleason4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPaul von Glumer vs John Miller6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKendrick McLish / Jeremy Thomas vs Richard Miranda / Glenn Tacke6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGregory Tamkin / Conn Flanigan vs Zack Palmer / Michael Sanders6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Doug Wiley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Kendrick McLish
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Rockwell Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.70
Bob Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.65
Greg Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Gregory Tamkin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Jeremy Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.64
Conn Flanigan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Jody Wright
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Paul von Glumer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Jeffrey Raval
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bob Sullivan + Kendrick McLish6156% games+11.7% vs expected
Bob Sullivan + Doug Wiley6352% games+2.8% vs expected
Bob Sullivan + Jeremy Thomas4550% games+0.2% vs expected
Kendrick McLish + Jeremy Thomas4453% games−1.3% vs expected
Rockwell Pearson + Conn Flanigan3253% games−3.8% vs expected
Jody Wright + Gregory Tamkin314 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Thomas + Rockwell Pearson314 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Tamkin + Conn Flanigan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Doug Wiley
62W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Kendrick McLish
67W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Rockwell Pearson
15W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Bob Sullivan
21W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Greg Rogers
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
Gregory Tamkin
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.65
Jeremy Thomas
16W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Conn Flanigan
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Jody Wright
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.56
3.5
Paul von Glumer
59W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Jeffrey Raval
89W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.