Teams

Jo.Bruckel55A

2025 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-26vs Da.Knox55AWon 10
W#2 DoublesIstvan Pataki / Mark Osborn vs Hai Le / Gerard Auvergne4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-18vs Da.Knox55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Bruckel / Jack Pyritz vs Daniel Knox / Hai Le6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Marchi / Alan Crews vs Steven Miller / Pete Vammino6-4, 6-4
2025-03-29vs Da.Knox55AWon 10
W#3 DoublesIstvan Pataki / Joey Jacobs vs Pete Vammino / Chris Fuhrer7-6, 7-6
2025-03-08vs Da.Knox55AWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoey Jacobs / Istvan Pataki vs Chris Fuhrer / Pete Vammino7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Istvan Pataki
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Robert Kent
published
3.78
Michael Hamlett
published
3.75
Michael Marchi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Mark Osborn
published
3.73
Jack Pyritz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Thomas Stieber
published
3.72
Alan Crews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Edward Farley
published 4
3.58
3.54
Gregory Kash
published 4
John Bruckel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Marchi + Thomas Stieber213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Marchi + Mark Osborn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Istvan Pataki
111W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Robert Kent
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
Michael Hamlett
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
Michael Marchi
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Mark Osborn
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Jack Pyritz
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Thomas Stieber
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Alan Crews
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Edward Farley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
OLLI-PEKKA Salovaara
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Gregory Kash
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
John Bruckel
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.