Teams

Hendersonville II/Kimmerling

MTTL · Division II

13 players · average NTRP 4.10 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · Division II
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hendersonville II/Kimmerling121932457602
2WCPR-Indoors Red/Hansen766057118950
3Seven Hills II/Piovarcy765463134995
4Sequoia II/Trapnell675166135990
5Adams Tennis Center/Sy495166127953
6WCPR-Indoors Blue/Simpson31042751421028

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Brittney Covington
published 4.5
4.22
Daniel Schafer
published 4.5
3.78
Joseph McComb
published
Darrin Carver
published 4
3.74
Bailey Gill
published 4
3.65
Stephen Tanner
published
3.61
Jonathan Mattise
published
3.60
Eric Kimmerling
published
3.26
Blake Neeley
published 3.5
Drake Watson
published
Giovanni Santos
published
Robert Schock
published
Tyler Estes
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brittney Covington
15W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Daniel Schafer
8W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Joseph McComb
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Darrin Carver
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Bailey Gill
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Stephen Tanner
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Jonathan Mattise
10W–12L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Eric Kimmerling
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Blake Neeley
2W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Drake Watson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Giovanni Santos
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Schock
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tyler Estes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.