Teams

Barnett/18/4.0/WD/LCRC

2025 Lake Charles Adult 18 & Over - Women · 4.0 LC (18&O) Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-11vs Camp/18/4.0/WD/LCRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlina Barnett / Jaime Crawford vs Lee Lanier / Carrie Kuehn2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCandice Alexander / Audra Jackson vs Bailey Bruchhaus / Casey Thompson1-6, 2-6
2025-05-04vs Camp/18/4.0/WD/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobin Camp / Audra Jackson vs Carrie Kuehn / Amanda Brinkman0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSheila Moody / Jaime Crawford vs Maggie Kuehn / Laurie Herrera4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlina Barnett / Candice Alexander vs Ana Denison / Jackie Heinen5-7, 1-6
2025-04-29vs Camp/18/4.0/WD/LCRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlina Barnett / Robin Camp vs Laurie Herrera / Lee Lanier6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJaime Crawford / Audra Jackson vs Jackie Heinen / Jill Rice6-7, 2-6
2025-03-30vs Camp/18/4.0/WD/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlina Barnett / Jaime Crawford vs Laurie Herrera / Jackie Heinen5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarsha Fruge / Candice Alexander vs Ana Denison / Amanda Brinkman3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSheila Moody / Robin Camp vs Maggie Kuehn / Lee Lanier0-6, 3-6
2025-03-23vs Camp/18/4.0/WD/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheila Moody / Jaime Crawford vs Ana Denison / Carrie Kuehn0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlina Barnett / Audra Jackson vs Faith Camp / Bailey Bruchhaus3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Camp / Carrie Watkins vs Laurie Herrera / Casey Thompson4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 LC (18&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alina Barnett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.29
Carrie Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Robin Camp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Audra Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jaime Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Marsha Fruge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila Moody
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alina Barnett
17W–7L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carrie Watkins
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Robin Camp
8W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Audra Jackson
16W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jaime Crawford
0W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marsha Fruge
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Moody
0W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.