Teams

TIA: Rebel Racquettes

2025 18&Over Women · 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-07vs Apawamis - Apo AcesLost 14
L#1 DoublesOphira Cukierman / Kate Fix vs Michaela Giovengo / Charotte MacKenzie5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Lulgjuraj vs Virginia Cocke6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesYumiko Tanaka / Joanne Teoh vs Charlotte Koster / Katharyn Kubursi7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesYael Wepman vs Alix Burke6-7, 4-4
L#3 DoublesJenn Yee / Tania de Chiara vs Mallory Hutchinson / Cecelia Rees5-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesHelene Ginsburg / Ophira Cukierman vs Kathleen DiSalvatore / Carolyn Comizio6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKate Fix vs Judy Bloom6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJenelle Aney / Megumi Shuler vs Jacqueline Bohan / Daniela Sansone6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAllison Prigozen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Manheim / Joanne Teoh vs Elaine Bauer / Daniela Becher6-4, 6-2
2025-06-23vs County Tennis Smash GirlsLost 13
L#1 DoublesHillary Portnoy / Barbara Rosenthal vs Nancy Huang / Anna Liu4-6, 6-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Lulgjuraj vs Megan Kerr2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJenelle Aney / Megumi Shuler vs Katherine Whyte / Sarina Shahmoon-Kleinman3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesHelene Ginsburg vs Yang Chen6-1, 6-3
2025-06-16vs Flint Park Aces of the BaselineWon 32
W#1 DoublesHillary Portnoy / Barbara Rosenthal vs Christine Groves / Charlotte Denoyer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Lulgjuraj vs Marisa Epstein2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Schuler / Helene Ginsburg vs Paisley Fenyes / Lauren Solimando6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesYael Wepman vs Caitlin Moffett6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandra Brudnick / Dana Hirsch vs Henriette Boehmert-Leske / Simone Ririmasse5-7, 3-6
2025-06-02vs Rye Racquet Club: Rye RacquettesLost 13
L#1 DoublesHelene Ginsburg / Kate Fix vs Elizabeth Toussi / Janice Cavatoni3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLaura Lulgjuraj vs Carol McNerney0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJenelle Aney / Megumi Shuler vs Kendall Truman / Laura Frase3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesYael Wepman vs Rebecca Dickson0-6, 4-6
2025-05-27vs OGTA Tennis LovinSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHelene Ginsburg / Barbara Rosenthal vs Amanda Barrow / Adelia Piazza6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaura Lulgjuraj vs Ellen Chubak6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesOphira Cukierman / Kate Fix vs Gulay Philip / Stefanie Vitti4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Schuler / Sandra Brudnick vs Jenny Wilson / Erica Naidorf3-6, 5-7
2025-05-19vs Match Point Set to WinLost 23
W#1 DoublesHillary Portnoy / Barbara Rosenthal vs Michelle Kushner / Sara Schlussel6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLaura Lulgjuraj vs Emilia Opiola4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesHelene Ginsburg / Jenelle Aney vs Maribel Unanue / Masako Reilly4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesYael Wepman vs Paula Loeb6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMegumi Shuler / Joanne Teoh vs Danielle Weiss / Kyle Healy6-1, 7-5
2025-05-12vs County CrushersLost 13
L#1 DoublesOphira Cukierman / Yumiko Tanaka vs Marielise Watts / Julie Lowitz6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesLaura Lulgjuraj vs Frida Matute1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHelene Ginsburg vs Shannon van Loon6-2, 5-7
W#3 DoublesYael Wepman / Jenn Yee vs Anne Kelly / Elizabeth Ward6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.73
Lukas Michenka
published
3.44
Kate Fix
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.38
Hillary Portnoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Barbara Rosenthal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Allison Prigozen
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Megumi Shuler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Helene Ginsburg
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.19
Joanne Teoh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Jenn Yee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.17
Stephanie Manheim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Yumiko Tanaka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Ophira Cukierman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Laura Lulgjuraj
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Jenelle Aney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Anna Schuler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Dana Hirsch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Yael Wepman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
2.97
Sandra Brudnick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Andrea Campana
published 3
Tania de Chiara
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Prigozen + Stephanie Manheim11262% games+11.9% vs expected
Dana Hirsch + Sandra Brudnick411460% games+6.2% vs expected
Hillary Portnoy + Barbara Rosenthal261655% games+5.3% vs expected
Yumiko Tanaka + Helene Ginsburg4155% games+4.8% vs expected
Barbara Rosenthal + Helene Ginsburg4351% games+4.5% vs expected
Ophira Cukierman + Helene Ginsburg8951% games+3.7% vs expected
Megumi Shuler + Jenelle Aney8256% games+3.3% vs expected
Hillary Portnoy + Helene Ginsburg3255% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lukas Michenka
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.73
Kate Fix
122W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Hillary Portnoy
65W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Barbara Rosenthal
87W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Allison Prigozen
37W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Megumi Shuler
68W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Helene Ginsburg
82W–74L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Joanne Teoh
41W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Jenn Yee
63W–42L career · 8 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Stephanie Manheim
45W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
Yumiko Tanaka
102W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Ophira Cukierman
53W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Laura Lulgjuraj
30W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Jenelle Aney
75W–81L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Anna Schuler
187W–155L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Dana Hirsch
52W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Yael Wepman
42W–29L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Sandra Brudnick
50W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Andrea Campana
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tania de Chiara
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.