Teams

Milani 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women 40 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-26vs GRETA 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesGinger Ballard / Allison Peters vs Kim Stewart / Michelle Shubert6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Johnstone / Lisa Sullivan vs Lorie Aiken / Heather Barber4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Mattacola / Tori Swanson vs Ashleigh Corthum / Selena West6-2, 6-1
2026-08-19vs Ray/Tucker 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelanie Burns / Tammy Milani vs Judy Tsuei / Melinda Tucker6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Ayers / Tori Swanson vs Sadaf Ahmad / Sandra Simpkins6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMelisa Lyles / Lisa Sullivan vs Carrie Hanger / Mitzi Burchinal6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Ginger Ballard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Melanie Burns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Catherine Johnstone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Donna Burick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Jennifer Ayers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Michelle Swinyer
published
2.71
Kathleen Mattacola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Melisa Lyles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Tori Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Meredith Uber
published
2.61
Allison Peters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.60
Tammy Milani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Kathleen LaMuraglia
published
2.50
Corinne Kendall
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Burick + Catherine Johnstone5173% games+24.9% vs expected
Kathleen LaMuraglia + Tammy Milani3356% games+9.6% vs expected
Donna Burick + Tammy Milani224 matchesnot enough data
Melisa Lyles + Tammy Milani303 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Mattacola + Kathleen LaMuraglia033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Ayers + Allison Peters213 matchesnot enough data
Tori Swanson + Catherine Johnstone123 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Milani + Meredith Uber123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginger Ballard
90W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
Melanie Burns
27W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Catherine Johnstone
34W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Donna Burick
31W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91
Jennifer Ayers
37W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
Michelle Swinyer
15W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Kathleen Mattacola
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Melisa Lyles
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Tori Swanson
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Meredith Uber
28W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.62
2.5
Allison Peters
15W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
Tammy Milani
32W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
0%24%76%
2.60
Kathleen LaMuraglia
18W–15L career · no lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
2.5
Corinne Kendall
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.