Teams

SGV Noobies-R. Lee-San Marino High/SA10

2025 Tri-Level League - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesBlason Taon / Sam Yang vs Adrian Tay / Ryan Cox3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesMichael Cheng / Melwin Pereira vs Michael Pang / Ryan Cox6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlan Han / Reeve Alvin Estioko vs Darren Wong / Derek Fu7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Kwok / June Ip vs Vincent Pun / Rudy Tatang2-6, 2-6
2025-08-17vs SoCal/Tang/Tri-Level4.5-3.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Bill Petrocelli vs AUSTIN HARVILL / Arman Davtyan1-6, 2-6
2025-07-05vs SoCal/Tang/Tri-Level4.5-3.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesBill Petrocelli / Nicholas Ambrosio vs Erik Martinez / Edgar Bove2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Bill Petrocelli
published 4.5
4.08
Alan Han
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Nicholas Ambrosio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Sebastian Koh
published
3.94
3.80
Sam Yang
published
3.74
Blason Taon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Kevin Chong
published
3.49
Derek La
published 3.5
3.46
Rand Lee
published
3.38
Abraam Guirguis
published 3.5
3.36
Thai Nguyen
published
3.21
Jeffrey Kwok
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
June Ip
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melwin Pereira
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Reeve Alvin Estioko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thai Nguyen + Derek La4355% games+6.3% vs expected
Abraam Guirguis + Thai Nguyen224 matchesnot enough data
Bill Petrocelli + Sam Yang213 matchesnot enough data
Sebastian Koh + Alan Han033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bill Petrocelli
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Alan Han
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Nicholas Ambrosio
90W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Sebastian Koh
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Dastan Mazhetayev
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Sam Yang
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.80
4
Blason Taon
84W–56L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Kevin Chong
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Derek La
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Rand Lee
2W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Abraam Guirguis
19W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Thai Nguyen
29W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Jeffrey Kwok
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
June Ip
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melwin Pereira
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Reeve Alvin Estioko
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.