Teams

Broward/Dillon - Erin/Sheri

2023 Broward Adult 55 & Over - Day · 9.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.44 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-10vs Veltri - JillWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheri Adler / Janine Burke vs Dawn Doyle / Karen Novick7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Castellanos / Cynthia Latham vs Catherine Morgan / Jill Rickey6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatricia Purcell / Andrea Cornelissen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-03vs Veltri - JillWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Castellanos / Hermine Greene vs Lynda Harrington / Deborah Rhodes6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHilary Landorf / Cindy Leprevost vs Catherine Morgan / Ellen Raskin2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSherril Colombo / Barbara Cabral vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-24vs Veltri - JillSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSheri Adler / Michelle Castellanos vs Catherine Morgan / Dawn Doyle6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLori Paglini / Janine Burke vs Deborah Rhodes / Barbara Clabby2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-02-17vs Veltri - JillWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanine Burke / Sherril Colombo vs Dawn Doyle / Theresa Crosno6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHilary Landorf / Cindy Leprevost vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-03vs Veltri - JillWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanine Burke / Jessy Sadovnik vs Dawn Doyle / Ellen Raskin6-4, 6-4
2023-01-27vs Veltri - JillWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanine Burke / Sherril Colombo vs Lynda Harrington / Karen Novick6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Castellanos / Cynthia Latham vs Ellen Raskin / Jill Rickey7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAndrea Cornelissen / Hermine Greene vs Catherine Morgan / Deborah Rhodes4-6, 2-6
2023-01-22vs Veltri - JillLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Cornelissen / Jessy Sadovnik vs Catherine Morgan / Deborah Rhodes4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLori Paglini / Cheryl Hicks vs Jill Rickey / Ellen Raskin1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Castellanos / Barbara Cabral vs Veronica Wank / Kumiko Currie6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Erin Manten
published 5
4.41
Michelle Castellanos
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.37
Andrea Cornelissen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.27
Janine Burke
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Cheryl Hicks
published 4.5
Cynthia Latham
published 4.5
4.12
Sherril Colombo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Barbara Cabral
published 4.5
3.94
Hilary Landorf
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.91
Hermine Greene
published
3.62
Lori Paglini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Paglini + Janine Burke4252% gamesnot enough data
Lori Paglini + Sherril Colombo123 matchesnot enough data
Sherril Colombo + Janine Burke303 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Landorf + Janine Burke213 matchesnot enough data
Erin Manten + Janine Burke303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Erin Manten
98W–67L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
Michelle Castellanos
23W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Andrea Cornelissen
70W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Janine Burke
266W–184L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Cheryl Hicks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Cynthia Latham
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherril Colombo
63W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Barbara Cabral
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
4.09
4
Hilary Landorf
64W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.94
Hermine Greene
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Lori Paglini
56W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.