Teams

Canyon Creek/Mathews-Hicks W3.0

2024 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

18 players · average NTRP 3.35 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Chrissy Stansell
published 4
3.59
Jacqueline Carson
published 3.5
3.58
Sarah Snitker
published
3.42
Jennifer Spoons
published
3.40
Jenifer Mathews
published
3.31
Melissa Fox
published
3.24
Ashley Samber
published 3.5
3.23
Cathy Langland
published 3.5
3.22
Hazel Robbins
published 3.5
3.14
Kim Henke
published
3.10
Colleen Petersen
published 3.5
3.05
Shelley Hicks
published
2.95
Emily Lea
published 3
2.86
Elysse Denton
published 3
2.75
Christy Gadoci
published 3
2.56
Lori Steenken
published
MRecia Beshires
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chrissy Stansell + Melissa Fox7173% games+14.1% vs expected
Ashley Samber + Sarah Snitker12362% games+7.3% vs expected
Sarah Snitker + Jacqueline Carson7263% games+2.1% vs expected
Chantelle Chandler + Lori Steenken224 matchesnot enough data
Jenifer Mathews + Sarah Snitker404 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Fox + Jennifer Spoons314 matchesnot enough data
Jenifer Mathews + Hazel Robbins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chrissy Stansell
32W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Jacqueline Carson
44W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.59
Sarah Snitker
44W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.58
Jennifer Spoons
32W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jenifer Mathews
20W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
Melissa Fox
31W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Ashley Samber
33W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Cathy Langland
13W–29L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Hazel Robbins
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Kim Henke
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Colleen Petersen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Shelley Hicks
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Emily Lea
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Chantelle Chandler
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Elysse Denton
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Christy Gadoci
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
Lori Steenken
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
MRecia Beshires
3W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.