Teams

OC YLCC - Holly 11am

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-12vs OC NBTC - NedraWon 10
W#1 DoublesShelly Morgan / Aimee Firouznam vs Miriam Morales / Anne Marie Block4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-12-05vs OC Lifetime SC - MerwinWon 20
W#2 DoublesHolly Bruning / Emily Lee vs Chelsea van Niekerk / Natalie Finn5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAimee Firouznam / Claudia Spaulding vs Darlene Redburn / Barbara Springer6-2, 6-0
2025-11-21vs OC LLW RCI - Bonnie - 12 S/SLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Bruning / PAMELA WEBB vs Valentina Stepanova / Theresa Jeong6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-10-31vs OC Lifetime San Clemente - KellyLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristy Harmon / Deborah Miller vs Michelle Duenas / Kathy Salter4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnnette Tran / Emily Lee vs Melissa Hill / Christine Parry2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRamona Chuang / Brenda Nardi vs Michelle Frohlich / Shelby Houle5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShelly Morgan / Aimee Firouznam vs Jennifer Czech / Cara Hofstad3-6, 4-6
2025-10-17vs OC LLW Dana Hills - Dara - 1030Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHolly Bruning / Candice Myers vs Julia Bruno McAndrew / Becky Graham3-6, 2-6
2025-09-26vs OC Dana Hills TC - ShinWon 20
W#1 DoublesHolly Bruning / Monica Kirby vs Nancy Mannix / Lisa Stone6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAimee Firouznam / Shelly Morgan vs Suzanna Wu / Julie Romero6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Candice Myers
published 4
3.86
Mandy Cuan
published
3.86
Christy Harmon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Holly Bruning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
3.69
PAMELA WEBB
published
3.62
Melinda Chu
published
3.60
Aimee Firouznam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Shelly Morgan
published
3.46
Emily Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Ramona Chuang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Terri Holly
published
Brenda Nardi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Monica Kirby
published
3.20
Natalie St Germain
published
3.11
Annette Tran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Erin Freimann
published
Josie Dailey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Spaulding + Aimee Firouznam3350% games−6.5% vs expected
Melinda Chu + Emily Lee5076% gamesnot enough data
Terri Holly + Monica Kirby314 matchesnot enough data
Terri Holly + Melinda Chu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Candice Myers
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.90
Mandy Cuan
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Christy Harmon
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Holly Bruning
73W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Claudia Spaulding
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
PAMELA WEBB
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Melinda Chu
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
4
Aimee Firouznam
67W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
Shelly Morgan
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Emily Lee
25W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Ramona Chuang
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.42
Terri Holly
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Brenda Nardi
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Monica Kirby
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Natalie St Germain
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
3.5
Annette Tran
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Erin Freimann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Josie Dailey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.