Teams

Shreveport Night - Pernici

55 & Over Combo Local at State - Women · 8.5 (55 & Over) Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-02vs Lafayette Day - BurgessLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarla Hildebrand / Jennifer Frederick vs Claire Burgess / Sonia Taylor2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSheila Pernici / Melissa Flurry vs Catherine Luc / Vallery Albritton2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Cannon / Rebecca Mayo vs Amanda Latiolais / Lisa James3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-01vs Lafayette Day - BurgessWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Frederick / Sheila Pernici vs Claire Burgess / Sonia Taylor1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTammy Cannon / Rebecca Mayo vs Amanda Latiolais / Mitzi Lalande6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarla Hildebrand / Melissa Flurry vs Vallery Albritton / Catherine Luc5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-01vs Baton Rouge Night - BourgeoisLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarla Hildebrand / Jennifer Frederick vs Tracy Simpson / Leanne Payne2-6
W#2 DoublesTammy Cannon / Rebecca Mayo vs Lucille Bourgeois / Catherine Hardy6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSheila Pernici / Melissa Flurry vs Allyson Morris / Tammy Noonan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-31vs Baton Rouge Night - BourgeoisLost 03
L#1 DoublesTammy Cannon / Melissa Flurry vs Lucille Bourgeois / Catherine Hardy6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Frederick / Sheila Pernici vs Tracy Simpson / Leanne Payne6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Mayo / Carla Hildebrand vs Allyson Morris / Tammy Noonan5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 (55 & Over) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Carla Hildebrand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Tammy Cannon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.03
Sheila Pernici
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Melissa Flurry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rebecca Mayo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Hildebrand + Sheila Pernici5846% games−14.7% vs expected
Tammy Cannon + Rebecca Mayo4354% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Cannon + Melissa Flurry3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carla Hildebrand
20W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
Tammy Cannon
23W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
Sheila Pernici
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
Melissa Flurry
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Mayo
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.