Teams

OC Irvine LPC - Leonard

2025 OC 55 & Over Mixed Doubles · OC WE 8.0

12 players · average NTRP / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-08vs OC BAT - CMTC - Pham Sat11Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJenny Zheng / Michael Hao Chen vs Giao Do / Julien Do2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesYoko Kurokawa / Forrest Morrow vs Trang Phan / Bryan Nguyen0-6, 2-6
2025-10-18vs OC BAT - CMTC - Pham Sat11Lost 02
L#1 DoublesYoko Kurokawa / Michael Hao Chen vs Kim Graham / Hanh Pham0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGeline Atienza / Jack Xie vs Giao Do / Bryan Nguyen0-6, 2-6
2025-10-11vs SoCal/Tran/55&Over8.0XDLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeonard Loventhal / Sue Chen-Wong vs Lai Chan / Jon Wang1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJack Xie / Yoko Kurokawa vs Frank Tran / Ping Chen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Hao Chen / Jenny Zheng vs Elizabeth Hoang / Carlo Bautista2-6, 2-6
2025-09-21vs OC RCI - Steven - Sun12Lost 03
L#1 DoublesYoko Kurokawa / Bertrand Miranda vs Dave Roeske / Patti Roeske3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesForrest Morrow / Nerie Ivers vs Steve Eperthener / Mercedes Natvig3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLeonard Loventhal / Jenny Zheng vs Catarina Chou / Pedro Chou1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC WE 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Yoko Kurokawa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Jenny Zheng
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Sandi Goldstein
published
Bertrand Miranda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Forrest Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Geline Atienza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jack Xie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jacqueline Pehkoff
published
Leonard Loventhal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Hao Chen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nerie Ivers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sue Chen-Wong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hao Chen + Jenny Zheng0623% gamesnot enough data
Forrest Morrow + Sue Chen-Wong123 matchesnot enough data
Forrest Morrow + Yoko Kurokawa213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yoko Kurokawa
16W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Jenny Zheng
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Sandi Goldstein
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Bertrand Miranda
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Forrest Morrow
26W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Geline Atienza
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jack Xie
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacqueline Pehkoff
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leonard Loventhal
5W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Hao Chen
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nerie Ivers
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sue Chen-Wong
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.