Teams

Kiwi - Konrad

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Early Start · 2.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-17vs EFSC - ArcherWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatey Benne / Pam Mcfadden vs Vida Zou / Calli Ohlin6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesStacy Konrad vs Brianna Stevens6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Burke / Dana Chesser vs Jenna Bajus / Elizabeth Thorne1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-12-03vs Kiwanis - WoodsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Hala / Pam Mcfadden vs Julie Thalen / Brenda Tarquinio0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStefania Acosta Ramirez / Emily Burke vs Linda Mesnard / Joanne Ludwig1-6, 1-6
2025-11-26vs Suntree - TaborLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacy Konrad / Donna Ford vs Marianne Fraser / Melissa Birchler2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKatey Benne / Emily Burke vs JANETTE TABOR / Mary Overton0-6, 5-7
2025-11-12vs EFSC - ArcherWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Sexton / Donna Ford vs Jenna Bajus / Mackenzie Sloan6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSummer Moses / Emily Burke vs Vida Zou / Gabriella Collura6-2, 6-3
2025-10-29vs Kiwanis - WoodsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatey Benne / Morgan Anderson vs Lael Woods / Stephanie Lasko3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDonna Ford vs Michelle Kne6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Sexton / Pam Mcfadden vs Eileen Bentley / Allison Moorhead4-6, 4-6
2025-10-22vs Suntree - TaborLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Sexton / Susan Hala vs Maria Reza / Mary Overton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStacy Konrad vs Tracy Thomas7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDana Chesser / Katey Benne vs JANETTE TABOR / Lisa Allen5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Pam Mcfadden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Stacy Konrad
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
Lisa Sexton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.31
Dana Chesser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Katey Benne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.23
Donna Ford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.18
Susan Hala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.96
Emily Burke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.96
Stefania Acosta Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Edna Chism
published
Summer Moses
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Burke + Dana Chesser134 matchesnot enough data
Donna Ford + Stacy Konrad134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Sexton + Donna Ford213 matchesnot enough data
Emily Burke + Summer Moses123 matchesnot enough data
Pam Mcfadden + Susan Hala123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Mcfadden
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
Stacy Konrad
10W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Lisa Sexton
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Dana Chesser
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Katey Benne
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Donna Ford
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Susan Hala
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Emily Burke
5W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Stefania Acosta Ramirez
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Edna Chism
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Summer Moses
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.