Teams

LEBTC GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-19vs HRCA-N REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesChad Boyd / Arin Neucks vs Ronald Rhinehart / Sadras Senthilvel6-2, 6-1
2023-07-12vs KC-CC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRichard Selim / Arin Neucks vs Clay Adams / Dustin Collins2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBrandon Dumler / Chad Boyd vs Robert Brigham / Ken Lisi6-3, 6-3
2023-07-05vs GAC NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrandon Dumler / Kevin Mahoney vs Patrick Reed / Alan Simpson3-6, 4-6
2023-06-28Won 20
W#1 SinglesArin Neucks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrandon Dumler / Kevin Mahoney vs Steve Sills / Mark Davis6-3, 6-0
2023-06-21vs SS-H GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrandon Dumler / Richard Selim vs Robert Alexander / Jeff Johnson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-14vs SS-G BLUEWon 10
W#1 SinglesArin Neucks vs Timothy Roberge6-3, 6-4
2023-06-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesArin Neucks / Vincent Gonzales vs David May / Daniel Moe6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Arin Neucks
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Richard Selim
published
3.76
Vincent Gonzales
published
3.68
Rick Schreiber
published
3.56
Kevin Mahoney
published
3.31
Brandon Dumler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Edward Partlow
published
Landon Hendricks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Selim + Arin Neucks4172% games+20.9% vs expected
Brandon Dumler + Kevin Mahoney1540% gamesnot enough data
Arin Neucks + Kevin Mahoney404 matchesnot enough data
Richard Selim + Rick Schreiber213 matchesnot enough data
Vincent Gonzales + Edward Partlow213 matchesnot enough data
Brandon Dumler + Arin Neucks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arin Neucks
96W–56L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
Richard Selim
26W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Vincent Gonzales
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Rick Schreiber
9W–17L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Kevin Mahoney
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Brandon Dumler
32W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Edward Partlow
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Landon Hendricks
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.