Teams

GSTL40/Watts/Surf

2025 Mixed 40 & Over- GSTL · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-29vs GSTL40/Gardner/PrestwickWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanny Butler / Jolynn Prochaska vs Mark Brown / Rene Smith6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSteve Starnes / Laura Oljeski vs William Potter / Linda Tangeman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-27vs GSTL40/Gardner/PrestwickLost 03
L#1 DoublesKirk Nobles / Jolynn Prochaska vs Shital Patel / William Potter5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPage Watts / Denise Watts vs Stephen Anderson / Linda Tangeman1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Johnson / Terry Walden vs Cheevin Gardner / Rene Smith6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-16vs GSTL40/Gardner/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesBruno Castaneda / Laura Oljeski vs Cheevin Gardner / Heather Johnson6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDan Cortese / Debbie Johnson vs Chris Hill / Stacy Hughes3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDanny Butler / Catherine Hill vs David Allen / Linda Tangeman6-2, 6-3
2025-07-09vs GSTL/40/Hale/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteve Starnes / Laura Oljeski vs Jonathan Catoe / Kimberly Case6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBruno Castaneda / Catherine Hill vs Amar Patel / Sarah LaPerle4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDan Cortese / Debbie Johnson vs Douglas Bradshaw / Kimberly Hale6-0, 6-2
2025-06-18vs GSTL/40/Hale/PrestwickWon 30
W#1 DoublesKirk Nobles / Laura Oljeski vs Tim Harris / Kimberly Case6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDanny Butler / Debbie Johnson vs Douglas Bradshaw / Kimberly Hale6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDan Cortese / Kelle Siegmund vs Matthew Hale / Sarah LaPerle7-5, 6-1
2025-06-08vs GSTL40/Gardner/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesJolynn Prochaska / Danny Butler vs Stacy Hughes / Michael Maely6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCatherine Hill / Jeff Kimbro vs William Potter / Rene Smith6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDebbie Johnson / Kirk Nobles vs Stephen Anderson / Linda Tangeman1-6, 1-6
2025-06-07vs GSTL/40/Hale/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesPage Watts / Denise Watts vs Amar Patel / Kimberly Case6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Kimbro / Catherine Hill vs Matthew Hale / Sarah LaPerle7-5, 2-1
W#3 DoublesTerry Walden / Jolynn Prochaska vs Jonathan Catoe / Keri Catoe6-3
2025-05-28vs GSTL/40/Hale/PrestwickWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Kimbro / Catherine Hill vs Matthew Hale / Sarah LaPerle6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKirk Nobles / Jolynn Prochaska vs Jonathan Catoe / Kimberly Hale6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Bruno Castaneda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.98
Danny Butler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.92
Jolynn Prochaska
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.87
Page Watts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Kirk Nobles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Jeff Kimbro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Laura Oljeski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Dan Cortese
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Steve Starnes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Catherine Hill
published 4
3.68
Denise Watts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.28
Terry Walden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kelle Siegmund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Page Watts + Denise Watts4361% gamesnot enough data
Kirk Nobles + Jolynn Prochaska213 matchesnot enough data
Dan Cortese + Kelle Siegmund303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bruno Castaneda
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
4.10
4
Danny Butler
17W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.98
Jolynn Prochaska
31W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Page Watts
15W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
Kirk Nobles
19W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Jeff Kimbro
14W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Laura Oljeski
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Dan Cortese
18W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Steve Starnes
19W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Catherine Hill
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Denise Watts
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Terry Walden
28W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Kelle Siegmund
7W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.