Teams

Ross 55 4.0

2025 Spring 55 & Over 3.0 - 4.0, 9.0 · 4.0 Adult 55 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-14vs SH - GarnerLost 02
L#1 DoublesKarl Ragan / Gary Seal vs Rick Wardlaw / Johnny Maplesden3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRonny Jones / John Chase vs Edwin Garner Jr / C Rhodes4-6, 3-6
2025-03-31vs SH - GarnerLost 02
L#1 DoublesTimmy Ross / Lee Hollis vs Eugene Schrock / Rick Wardlaw4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRonny Jones / Gary Seal vs Edwin Garner Jr / Andy Martin4-6, 4-6
2025-03-24vs SH - GarnerLost 02
L#1 DoublesLee Hollis / Timmy Ross vs Andy Martin / Stanley Posey2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRonny Jones / Gary Seal vs Rick Wardlaw / Johnny Maplesden3-6, 5-7
2025-03-10vs SH - GarnerLost 02
L#1 DoublesLee Hollis / Gary Seal vs Eugene Schrock / Rick Wardlaw2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTimmy Ross / Ronny Jones vs C Rhodes / Johnny Maplesden1-6, 1-6
2025-03-10vs SH - GarnerLost 03
L#1 DoublesGary Seal / Karl Ragan vs Kevin Strickland / Johnny Maplesden2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTimmy Ross / John Chase vs Steve Parker / David Bachofer4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesFleet Willoughby / Ronny Jones vs C Rhodes / Edwin Garner Jr5-7, 5-7
2025-03-03vs SH - GarnerLost 12
L#1 DoublesRonny Jones / Gary Seal vs Mark Smith / Steve Parker4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLee Hollis / Fleet Willoughby vs Andy Martin / Stanley Posey6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKarl Ragan / Timmy Ross vs Eugene Schrock / Rick Wardlaw3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Adult 55 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SH - Garner60171399
2Ross 55 4.00611734212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Lynn Dixon
published
3.55
John Chase
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Ronny Jones
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.50
Gary Seal
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Fleet Willoughby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Timmy Ross
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.41
Karl Ragan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lee Hollis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronny Jones + Gary Seal044 matchesnot enough data
Timmy Ross + Karl Ragan044 matchesnot enough data
Ronny Jones + John Chase033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Dixon
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
John Chase
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Ronny Jones
0W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Gary Seal
0W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Fleet Willoughby
23W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Timmy Ross
3W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.42
Karl Ragan
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.41
Lee Hollis
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.