Teams

GLVR-Shupp 3.0

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-15vs CRRC-OunaphomWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnn Meditz / Deb Landau vs Annie Lamb / Cheri Mosbrucker6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAnabel Capalbo vs Alana Miner6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNichole Dewson / Kathleen Coughran vs Elena Kochetkova / Sharon Wise2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeannette Shupp / Carrie Scott vs Lauren Kimmel / Julie Poetsch1-6, 1-6
2026-03-01vs MPRC-Amarga-LeeLost 04
L#1 DoublesColleen Atherton / Jeannette Shupp vs Kristi Tompkins / Rupali Avasare1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAnn Meditz vs Sheila Amarga-Lee3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeb Landau / Anabel Capalbo vs Laurel Soot / Allie Roth1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLeola Ristau / Carrie Scott vs June Xiao / Xiaobo Dai5-7, 1-6
2026-02-14vs PTC-Browne Hoffman/AlleyLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnn Meditz / Nichole Dewson vs Amy Carolan / Lorri Asder7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesColleen Atherton vs Melinee Steck1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDeb Landau / Anabel Capalbo vs Yone Akagi / Katja Daoud1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarrie Scott / Kathleen Coughran vs Dana Alley / Robin Browne Hoffman1-6, 3-6
2026-02-08vs THPRD-Li/JosephLost 04
L#1 DoublesDeb Landau / Nichole Dewson vs Nicole Norby / Alice Holland0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesColleen Atherton vs Ying Deng2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Meditz / Kathleen Coughran vs Janice Kuo / Jeny Joseph1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLeola Ristau / Carrie Scott vs Shuping Li / Manisha Thakkar3-6, 1-6
2026-02-01vs VTC-DarlingLost 13
L#1 DoublesDeb Landau / Kathleen Coughran vs Teresa Darling / Maryann Velez5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAnabel Capalbo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Meditz / Nichole Dewson vs Amy Hicks / Brooke Henderson7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeannette Shupp / Leola Ristau vs Athena Rubin / Robin Burak1-6, 0-6
2026-01-25vs THPRD-Li/JosephLost 04
L#1 DoublesKathleen Coughran / Ann Meditz vs Catherine Huang / Alice Holland4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnabel Capalbo vs Erin Canova4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDeb Landau / Nichole Dewson vs Evelyne Cassell / Manisha Thakkar6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeannette Shupp / Carrie Scott vs Ying Deng / Jennifer Tobin0-6, 1-6
2026-01-10vs WHRC-Palmer/AlfonsoLost 13
L#1 DoublesColleen Atherton / Nichole Dewson vs Karen Moisant / Phyllis Ghazi3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnn Meditz vs Xizhen Palmer6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCarrie Scott / Leola Ristau vs Linda Ballard / Sue Donora1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeannette Shupp / Kathleen Coughran vs Jennifer Whitten / Jennifer Thompson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-01-03vs IRV-Cooke/SelisLost 13
L#1 DoublesDeb Landau / Nichole Dewson vs Nozomi Bray / Kathy Cooke3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesColleen Atherton vs Kelly Letourneau2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnabel Capalbo / Kathleen Coughran vs Kate Sullivan / Michelle Boucher3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Meditz / Carrie Scott vs Angela Jackson / Kristin DeVoto4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Ann Meditz
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.65
Anabel Capalbo
usually #1 Singles 77%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 2.5
2.56
Colleen Atherton
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.52
Nichole Dewson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.51
Deb Landau
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.46
Kathleen Coughran
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.39
Carrie Scott
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.38
Leola Ristau
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.14
Jeannette Shupp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deb Landau + Ann Meditz6255% games+4.1% vs expected
Kathleen Coughran + Jeannette Shupp224 matchesnot enough data
Deb Landau + Nichole Dewson044 matchesnot enough data
Leola Ristau + Carrie Scott033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Meditz
7W–8L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
2.5
Anabel Capalbo
32W–8L career · 13 lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.65
3
Colleen Atherton
30W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Nichole Dewson
7W–25L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
2.52
3
Deb Landau
16W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Kathleen Coughran
10W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
3
Carrie Scott
0W–7L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.39
3
Leola Ristau
1W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
Jeannette Shupp
11W–36L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.