Teams

SD 4.0 Coronado Cays/ Hammond (2:2)

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD · SD - Women - WD 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.95 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-23vs SoCal/Bourne/40&Over4.0WWon 31
L#1 DoublesMelissa Kroeger / Diana Meskimen vs Jennifer Knock / Christine Golemb3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTugce Varol vs Terri Bourne6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTeresa Bear / Susie Alvarez vs Rory Tarantino / Dara Stern6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCristina Rassvetaieff / JIMENA CUEVAS vs Becky Kuba / Regan Brown7-6, 6-3
2022-03-16vs SD 4.0 Coronado Cays/ Webster (2:2)Split 11
W#1 DoublesTugce Varol / Melissa Kroeger vs Jill Webster / Marcia Bennett7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusie Alvarez / Elsie Hammond vs Meredith White / Vivian McAnally0-6, 3-6
2022-03-09vs SD 4.0 Moutain View/ McLellan (3:1)Split 11
W#1 DoublesBeth Timpe / Melissa Kroeger vs Bea Vega / Rosie Wagner4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElsie Hammond / Tugce Varol vs Miho Nakajima / Chigusa Okubo2-6, 1-6
2022-03-02vs SD 4.0 SDTRC/ Hanson (2:2)Won 31
W#1 DoublesMelissa Kroeger / Beth Timpe vs Soledad Ramirez / Jennie Blacker7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLinda la Terza vs Chris Daher6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElsie Hammond / Jennifer Vanderhyden vs Christina Stow / Carri Burns7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTugce Varol / Joan Fahrenthold vs Yvonne Angyal / Kristan Hanson5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesIlana Umansky / Cristina Rassvetaieff vs Gina Freize / Sheryl Munning6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTugce Varol vs Jada Cade1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Kroeger / Jennifer Vanderhyden vs Kristin Ryner / Esther Leeflang6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusie Alvarez / Diana Meskimen vs Jill Lehr / Meredith White6-7, 3-6
2022-02-02vs SD 4.0 Moutain View/ McLellan (3:1)Split 22
L#1 DoublesBeth Timpe / Melissa Kroeger vs Chigusa Okubo / Miho Nakajima4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLinda la Terza vs Bea Vega6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCristina Rassvetaieff / JIMENA CUEVAS vs Michiyo Killeen / Joan Yngson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElsie Hammond / Jackie Zoldy vs Barbara Kucinski / Adriana Vazquez3-6, 4-6
2022-01-26vs SD 4.0 SDTRC/ Hanson (2:2)Lost 13
W#1 DoublesJennifer Vanderhyden / Melissa Kroeger vs Jennie Blacker / Randie Lettington5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSusie Alvarez vs Jennifer Brady7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCristina Rassvetaieff / JIMENA CUEVAS vs Ashley Stone / Carri Burns6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElsie Hammond / Maria Simon vs Kristan Hanson / Lorena Monzon5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-01-19vs SoCal/Bourne/40&Over4.0WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMelissa Kroeger / Beth Timpe vs Regan Brown / Jennifer Knock6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSusie Alvarez vs Francesca Kornberg0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElsie Hammond / Jackie Zoldy vs Janene Christopher / Christine Golemb3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLinda la Terza / Tugce Varol vs Barbara Roorda / Yvonne Kalench6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - WD 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Linda la Terza
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Melissa Kroeger
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.79
Beth Timpe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Cristina Rassvetaieff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Jennifer Vanderhyden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Jackie Zoldy
published 4
3.47
Teresa Bear
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Elsie Hammond
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Susie Alvarez
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.40
Tugce Varol
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elsie Hammond + Tugce Varol92641% games−6.5% vs expected
Melissa Kroeger + Beth Timpe7351% games−9.9% vs expected
Jennifer Vanderhyden + Elsie Hammond31140% games−15.7% vs expected
Jennifer Vanderhyden + Tugce Varol2442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Linda la Terza
121W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Melissa Kroeger
51W–60L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Beth Timpe
99W–76L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Cristina Rassvetaieff
75W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Jennifer Vanderhyden
59W–104L career · 3 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Jackie Zoldy
52W–74L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Teresa Bear
87W–45L career · 1 line in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Elsie Hammond
66W–161L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
4
Susie Alvarez
84W–81L career · 5 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
4
Tugce Varol
56W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.