Teams

ACAC Callaghan

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-14vs TDC SpillareLost 01
L#2 DoublesNikki Callaghan / Barbara Kasten vs Fran Wigner / Erica Bragg6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2023-06-09vs WOCC MoehlingLost 01
L#1 DoublesNikki Callaghan / Martinique Kandl vs Elizabeth Boyle / Jenefer Williams4-6, 2-6
2023-05-31vs Twin Hickory YuWon 10
W#3 DoublesAllison Krumpe / Barbara Kasten vs Amy Buckberg / Mary Apruzzese6-3, 6-1
2023-05-26vs ACAC NaylorWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Martinique Kandl vs Julie Rison / Dawn Toft7-5, 6-3
2023-05-15vs KRA Fleck / WalekWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Martinique Kandl vs Carlyle Walek / Kristy Seredni7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Robin Griffith
published
3.43
Martinique Kandl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Allison Krumpe
published 3.5
3.35
Jodi Tandett
published
3.27
Barbara Kasten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Nikki Callaghan
published
3.20
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
3.17
Irene Quilez
published
2.69
Theresa Bartholomew
published
Judy Duke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martinique Kandl + Barbara Kasten6160% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Tandett + Barbara Kasten123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robin Griffith
32W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Martinique Kandl
166W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Allison Krumpe
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Jodi Tandett
18W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Barbara Kasten
156W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Nikki Callaghan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Irene Quilez
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Theresa Bartholomew
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
Judy Duke
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.