Teams

3-JWolfe-Eno

2023 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men-Evening

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-11vs 1-JByrd/Naftel4.5-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJake Wolfe / Parker Sheridan vs Kenneth Nelson / Peter Hull3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs Ryan Lewis6-1, 6-0
2023-04-20vs 1-JByrd/Naftel4.5-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesJake Wolfe / Parker Sheridan vs Julien de la Mettrie / Herman Naftel4-6, 2-6
2023-04-10vs 2-RMcClenny-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAaron Hiller / Parker Sheridan vs William Jones / Tim Rufiange5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs Justin Akonful6-0, 6-3
2023-03-30vs 1-JByrd/Naftel4.5-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Justin Fowler vs Herman Naftel / Jackson Naftel2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesParker Sheridan vs Ryan Lewis2-6, 2-6
2023-03-23vs 2-RMcClenny-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAneesh Kodali / James Miron vs William Jones / Tim Rufiange6-3, 6-4
2023-03-09vs 1-JByrd/Naftel4.5-EnoSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs James Rees7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKyle Couch / Parker Sheridan vs Jermaine Byrd / Curtis Lawson6-7, 1-6
2023-03-02vs 2-RMcClenny-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Parker Sheridan vs Jason Abhau / Tim Rufiange6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Parker Sheridan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.35
James Miron
published 4.5
4.34
Aneesh Kodali
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 4.5
4.29
Aaron Hiller
published 4.5
4.21
Patrick Grant
published
4.06
John Pelphrey
published
3.99
Kyle Couch
published
3.95
Matt Piland
published
3.73
Justin Fowler
published
Jake Wolfe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aneesh Kodali + Parker Sheridan404 matchesnot enough data
Matt Piland + Kyle Couch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Parker Sheridan
202W–65L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
James Miron
17W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Aneesh Kodali
119W–59L career · type A · 11 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Aaron Hiller
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
4.29
Patrick Grant
20W–23L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.21
John Pelphrey
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.06
Kyle Couch
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.99
Matt Piland
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
Justin Fowler
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Jake Wolfe
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.