Teams

LTFC NAVY

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-28vs HV YELLOWWon 10
W#1 SinglesLindsay Piepgras vs Rhonda Williamson6-1, 6-0
2023-08-21vs WC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Franciscus / Lindsay Piepgras vs Sara Watson / Melanie Adams6-4, 6-3
2023-08-14vs HRCA-N WHITEWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Franciscus / Lindsay Piepgras vs Danielle Butler / Jane Jussila4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-07vs SS-H PINKWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Piepgras / Rebecca Franciscus vs Kristie Gill / Suzanne Kwilman6-1, 6-3
2023-07-24vs HV YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Franciscus / Lindsay Piepgras vs Morgen Calgaard / Libby Palmer6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Rebecca Franciscus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Lindsay Piepgras
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Debra Stamatis
published 3.5
3.12
Elaine Mariner
published
2.76
Margaret Fuller
published
Shelley Chism
published
Theresa Gilpatrick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Franciscus + Lindsay Piepgras421757% games+1.0% vs expected
Debra Stamatis + Elaine Mariner1447% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rebecca Franciscus
90W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Lindsay Piepgras
63W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Debra Stamatis
32W–91L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Elaine Mariner
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.12
Margaret Fuller
8W–20L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Darlene Jensen-Walker
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelley Chism
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Theresa Gilpatrick
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.