Teams

TEby (OPRC)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-02vs CAckels (PCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Krug / Nannette Markham vs Laura Richards / Jenjer Robin6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCaroleen Towery / Stacey Lee vs Julia Murphy / Shannon McCoy6-0, 6-1
2023-09-25vs SGoins (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Krug / Christine Shultz vs Jen Dauska / Mandi Mohammed2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-09-18vs LShelton/NMalter (BCC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAnne Krug / Brooke Terrell vs Tracy Reitz / Kristin Webster2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAngie Mehrizi / Caroleen Towery vs Karen Maskas / Michelle Silla7-5, 6-2
2023-08-24vs KDouglas/DFricke (Firethorne CC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristine Shultz / Anne Krug vs Julianne Gray / Sue Ann Lang6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Wilson / Angie Mehrizi vs Danielle Fricke / TARA RAND2-6, 1-6
2023-08-21vs LO'Bryan/CTerry (WSRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesStacey Lee / Angie Mehrizi vs Lisa Leake / Susan Staley7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCaroleen Towery / Anne Krug vs Jen Shelley / Kym Armbruster6-3, 6-1
2023-08-14vs CAckels (PCC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesAnne Krug / Caroleen Towery vs Shannon McCoy / Julia Murphy6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAngie Mehrizi / Brooke Terrell vs Jenjer Robin / Laura Richards1-6, 1-6
2023-08-07vs SGoins (Carmel)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNannette Markham / Caroleen Towery vs PerMar Olin / Stephanie Parker4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngie Mehrizi / Brooke Terrell vs Casey Fuller / Maureen Hussey6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christine Shultz
published 3
2.69
Angie Mehrizi
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.68
Caroleen Towery
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Casey Beck
published 3
2.63
Anne Krug
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Nannette Markham
published
2.56
Surabhi Chopra
published
2.50
Tiffany Eby
published
2.38
Lauren Packman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Krug + Angie Mehrizi41240% games−7.1% vs expected
Anne Krug + Caroleen Towery4356% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christine Shultz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Angie Mehrizi
44W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Caroleen Towery
50W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Casey Beck
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Anne Krug
25W–49L career · 6 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
Nannette Markham
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
2.62
Surabhi Chopra
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%34%66%
2.56
Tiffany Eby
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Lauren Packman
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%80%20%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.