Teams

Alachua - DB/Pu

2022 Alachua Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesJian Pu / Mark Diblin vs Raymond Hopkins / Richard Wright6-3, 6-1
2022-03-30vs JTC - LancasterWon 10
W#1 DoublesEd Stark / Scott Thompson vs LEROY BROWN / William Landis7-5, 6-0
2022-03-26vs JTC - LancasterWon 20
W#1 DoublesJorg Bungert / Jerry Lu vs LEROY BROWN / William Landis7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJian Pu / Frank Kenlon vs Philip Lancaster / James Araujo6-1, 6-2
2022-03-13vs 300 - SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesJian Pu / Jorg Bungert vs Ray Brady / Paul Askew1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-19vs 300 - SmithWon 30
W#1 DoublesEd Stark / Donald van Schuppen vs George Cawthon / Erik Bredfeldt6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJorg Bungert / Jerry Lu vs Ray Brady / Paul Askew6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKevin Smith / Jian Pu vs Malcolm Maden / Efren Vasquez6-1, 6-2
2022-02-12vs JTC - LancasterWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarkus Schneider / Jian Pu vs William Landis / Carlos Ortiz6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJerry Lu / Jorg Bungert vs Song Lai / Thomas Yonge6-2, 6-3
2022-01-29vs JTC - LancasterWon 10
W#1 DoublesEd Stark / Donald van Schuppen vs Song Lai / Carlos Ortiz7-5, 6-4
2022-01-22vs 300 - SmithWon 21
L#1 DoublesEd Stark / Frank Kenlon vs Ray Brady / Paul Askew6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJian Pu / Kevin Smith vs John Flowers / James Saxon6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJerry Lu / Jorg Bungert vs George Cawthon / Erik Bredfeldt6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Ed Stark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Kevin Smith
published
3.21
Mark Diblin
published
3.06
Jian Pu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Jorg Bungert
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jorg Bungert + Ed Stark11951% games−5.7% vs expected
Jorg Bungert + Jian Pu4944% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ed Stark
288W–120L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kevin Smith
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Mark Diblin
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Jian Pu
103W–117L career · 6 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Jorg Bungert
120W–110L career · 5 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.