Teams

JRosen-CHCC

2025 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-03vs KTravis-DURSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMarybeth Evers / Stacey Lange vs Amy Kell / Becky King6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Holroyd / Diane Koenigshofer vs Erica Shirts / Katie Elder1-6, 3-6
2025-09-26vs KJohnson-UNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarybeth Evers / Stacey Lange vs Cheryl Stevens / Courtney Mills6-4, 6-3
2025-09-19vs HHutchins-CHCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Holroyd / Sarah Sapeta vs Keri A Clark / Kate Souto0-6, 2-6
2025-09-05vs LHsu-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Koenigshofer / Stacey Lange vs Carrie Norry / Preeya Gupta6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSarah Sapeta / Courtney Yarbrough vs Tara Russell / Tina Prinstein4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-22vs MDuncker-HVCCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLaurel Zdanski / Sarah Sapeta vs Sarah Bronico / Joanie Preyer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSara Moody / Diane Koenigshofer vs Stacey Smith / Deborah Hertzog6-1, 6-2
2025-08-19vs KTravis-DURLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Fernandez / Marybeth Evers vs Amber Oberle / Colleen Davis6-7, 4-6
2025-08-15vs EBlack-DURSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarybeth Evers / Stacey Lange vs Julie Brigham / Jennifer Taylor6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaurel Zdanski / Sarah Sapeta vs Ngoc Tran / Elizabeth Black5-7, 3-6
2025-08-01vs KJohnson-UNCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Rosen / Marybeth Evers vs Kate Harshbarger / Elaine Yeh3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Yarbrough / Laurel Zdanski vs Cheryl Stevens / Courtney Mills1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Diane Koenigshofer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Lynn Furgurson
published
3.22
Monica Jenkins
published
3.22
Stacey Lange
published
3.21
Marybeth Evers
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Lisa Munster
published 3.5
3.15
Laurel Zdanski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
2.98
Sara Moody
published
2.79
Jennifer Rosen
published
2.78
Jennifer Yost
published
2.77
Sarah Sapeta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
2.59
Jane Holroyd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marybeth Evers + Diane Koenigshofer134 matchesnot enough data
Marybeth Evers + Sarah Sapeta404 matchesnot enough data
Diane Koenigshofer + Sarah Sapeta134 matchesnot enough data
Monica Jenkins + Carrie Williamson123 matchesnot enough data
Monica Jenkins + Stacey Lange123 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Lange + Lisa Munster213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Koenigshofer
35W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Lynn Furgurson
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Monica Jenkins
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Stacey Lange
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Marybeth Evers
90W–118L career · 8 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Lisa Munster
32W–34L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Laurel Zdanski
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
3
Carrie Williamson
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Sara Moody
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Jennifer Rosen
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Jennifer Yost
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Sarah Sapeta
95W–89L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Courtney Yarbrough
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Jane Holroyd
4W–18L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.