Teams

IE-LLW-MTC-Shelter

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-17vs IE-CL-CardozaWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Radogna / Teresa Festorazzi vs Carrie Collins / Therese Washle7-5, 6-2
2024-03-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesIrene Capen / Teresa Festorazzi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-17vs IE-Andulka-CarterWon 10
W#2 DoublesTeresa Festorazzi / Jennivieve Randolph vs Kristina Cendrowski / Monette Schwartz6-1, 6-3
2024-02-11vs IE-CL-CardozaWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlicia Larson / Maria Miller vs Satoko Parsons / Jennifer Denson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTeresa Festorazzi / Stacy Westfall vs Tina Maslach / Therese Washle7-5, 6-4
2024-02-04vs IE-Andulka-HaoWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlicia Larson / Teresa Festorazzi vs Alejandrina Martinez / Elizabeth Rydall1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-14vs IE-Andulka-CarterWon 20
W#1 DoublesTeresa Festorazzi / Stacy Westfall vs Pingkham Rattanababpha / Skyla Carter6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAlicia Larson / Maria Miller vs Kam Jara / Madeleine Taylor6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Denise Radogna
published 3.5
3.06
Alicia Larson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Teresa Festorazzi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Stacy Westfall
published
2.72
Erika Nevares
published
2.71
Jennivieve Randolph
published
2.68
Shirin Lieberman
published
2.65
Irene Capen
published
Lisa Montero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennivieve Randolph + Irene Capen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Radogna
10W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
3
Alicia Larson
59W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Teresa Festorazzi
58W–41L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Stacy Westfall
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.76
Erika Nevares
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Jennivieve Randolph
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Shirin Lieberman
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Irene Capen
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
Lisa Montero
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.