Teams

WP NAVY

2026 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TRIO

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-02vs CP REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Merman / Talwin Filholm vs Jeff Walters / Peter Horsch6-3, 4-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Davis / Pil Kim vs Brett Beard / David Atkinson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-25vs TTA GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Anderson / Chris Merman vs Mark Walter / Toua Vang7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesPil Kim vs David Mead6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Merman / Talwin Filholm vs Akshay Bakshi / Rich Marks6-2, 7-5
2026-04-18vs CP GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Merman / Jeffrey Merman vs Gary Beck / Glenn Junik6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPil Kim vs Dave Dombrowski2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMark Anderson / Talwin Filholm vs Brian Friel / Jerry Saltzman6-2, 7-6
2026-04-11vs TTA REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Anderson / Talwin Filholm vs Joey Garcia / Kevin Darby5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesPil Kim vs Brett Herbert6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJohn Davis / Jeffrey Merman vs John Daniel Singaram / Michael Ely6-7, 4-6
2026-04-04vs MVCC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Anderson / Juan Camilo vs Steven Hardegen / Robert Charles6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Merman / Talwin Filholm vs John Mullins / Rob Brine6-1, 6-0
2026-03-28vs CP REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Anderson / Juan Camilo vs John Endrud / Peter Horsch6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesPil Kim vs Cam Weprin6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Davis / Talwin Filholm vs Brett Beard / Howard Sankel4-6, 1-6
2026-03-21vs TTA GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Anderson / Juan Camilo vs Mark Walter / Frederick Longobricco6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChris Merman vs Andy Roemersberger6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPil Kim / Talwin Filholm vs Rich Marks / Akshay Bakshi6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Juan Camilo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Chris Merman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Talwin Filholm
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.27
Jeffrey Merman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Pil Kim
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Merman + Talwin Filholm15070% games+13.1% vs expected
Pil Kim + Talwin Filholm123 matchesnot enough data
Talwin Filholm + Chris Merman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juan Camilo
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Chris Merman
27W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Talwin Filholm
125W–69L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Jeffrey Merman
136W–81L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Pil Kim
12W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.