Teams

Moore/Memphis

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 5.5 18 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-25vs Shackelford/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesAshley Elder / Tatiana de la Barrera vs Micaela Cignetti / Samantha Rohlinger7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Scott / Jenny Harmeier vs Charissa Derieg / Ashley Bush6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngie Moore / Amy Smith vs Maria Gonzalez / Kristin Hicks6-7, 3-6
2025-09-18vs Beanblossom/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Brimhall / Amanda Scott vs Alexandra Morin / Carrie Anderson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngie Moore / Allison McCool vs Frannie Franks / Anna Smith2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesToni Carmichael / Kelly Richardson Dahlgren vs Janie Beanblossom / Ashley Powers0-6, 0-6
2025-09-10vs Galdieri/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Smith / Jenny Harmeier vs Paige Swanquist / Stephanie Bailey6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Scott / Ashley Elder vs Diana Galdieri / Kelly Baker2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Richardson Dahlgren / Toni Carmichael vs Jeanne Cannon / Sherene Katzman0-6, 3-6
2025-09-04vs Galdieri/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Smith / Jenny Harmeier vs Paige Swanquist / Kimberly Hester3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Elder / Catherine Brimhall vs Hollie Marszalek / Shawnelle Davis6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Scott / Angie Moore vs Emily Craven / Stephanie Bailey3-6, 1-6
2025-08-28vs Wisley/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesJenny Harmeier / Amy Smith vs Nicci Watson / Aimee Puryear6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTatiana de la Barrera / Allison McCool vs Suzanne Lomax / Katherine Slater2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesToni Carmichael / Angela Finerson vs Rebecca Slater / Jennifer Stettler1-6, 1-6
2025-08-21vs Shackelford/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Scott / Allison McCool vs Maria Gonzalez / Nancy Chandrasekaran3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCatherine Brimhall / Ashley Elder vs Micaela Cignetti / Samantha Rohlinger4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngie Moore / Kelly Richardson Dahlgren vs Erin Shackelford / Charissa Derieg1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-08-14vs Beanblossom/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngie Moore / Angela Finerson vs Julie Little / Alison Elkington1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAllison McCool / Toni Carmichael vs Janie Beanblossom / Alexandra Morin0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Smith / Kelly Richardson Dahlgren vs Diana Phillips / Krystal Shaw6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-13vs Wisley/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Smith / Jenny Harmeier vs Aimee Puryear / Taylor Wisley6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Brimhall / Ashley Elder vs Leigh Lamb / Nicci Watson6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngie Moore / Angela Finerson vs Suzanne Lomax / Jennifer Stettler6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carrie McLemore
published 3
2.57
Angie Moore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.56
Jenny Harmeier
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.56
Ashley Elder
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.48
Allison McCool
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.36
Catherine Brimhall
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.21
Kelly Richardson Dahlgren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Angela Finerson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.10
Toni Carmichael
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tatiana de la Barrera
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Harmeier + Angie Moore5550% games+9.3% vs expected
Toni Carmichael + Angie Moore1438% games−4.6% vs expected
Toni Carmichael + Kelly Richardson Dahlgren044 matchesnot enough data
Angela Finerson + Angie Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carrie McLemore
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Angie Moore
30W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.57
Jenny Harmeier
17W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Ashley Elder
13W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Allison McCool
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Catherine Brimhall
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
Kelly Richardson Dahlgren
7W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Angela Finerson
16W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
Toni Carmichael
9W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Tatiana de la Barrera
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.