Teams

ACAC - Bryerton

2026 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-14vs FL - Lindhurst - Forest LakersLost 23
L#1 DoublesEric Bryerton / Matt Jones vs Marian Dic / Devin Lindhurst1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSwapnil Sonkusare vs Samuel Tanner0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesZane Broden / Wesley Carson vs Brian Costello / Lawrence Wilson6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesRichard Sawyer vs Owen Franks4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPablo Barrague / Pat BRadley vs Rick Aasen / Vitaly Zimyanin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-18vs BHSC - Garriott - BaselinersSplit 22
L#1 SinglesEric Bryerton vs Ryan McCormack1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMatt Jones / Wesley Carson vs Chris Stewart / Steve Lichtenstein6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSwapnil Sonkusare vs Matthew Hedstrom7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPablo Barrague / Zane Broden vs David Burns / Todd Hochrein1-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs BHSC - Garriott - BaselinersLost 23
W#1 DoublesWesley Carson / Matt Jones vs James Griffin / Tim Grossman6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesPablo Barrague vs Omar Garriott4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesZane Broden / Eric Bryerton vs Logan Martin / Hans Gerling4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesPat BRadley vs Ryan McCormack7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Sawyer / Christopher Raupp vs Jonathan Bryan / Steve Lichtenstein1-6, 2-6
2026-05-09vs FL - Lindhurst - Forest LakersWon 41
W#1 DoublesMatt Jones / Wesley Carson vs Edward Furlow / Igor Shumilin6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPat BRadley vs Rick Aasen6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPablo Barrague / Swapnil Sonkusare vs Gregory Parrish / Brian Costello6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNathan Parow vs Marian Dic0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesZane Broden / Eric Bryerton vs Lawrence Wilson / Vitaly Zimyanin6-0, 6-3
2026-05-04vs FL - Lindhurst - Forest LakersLost 23
W#1 DoublesMatt Jones / Pablo Barrague vs Edward Furlow / Rick Aasen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNathan Parow vs Devin Lindhurst0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEric Bryerton / Pat BRadley vs Lindsay Ellis / Lawrence Wilson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesZane Broden vs Samuel Tanner3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLloyd Raupp / Wesley Carson vs Gregory Parrish / Igor Shumilin7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-25vs BHSC - Garriott - BaselinersLost 13
L#1 DoublesLloyd Raupp / Matt Jones vs Omar Garriott / Ryan McCormack3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesWesley Carson vs Hans Gerling1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPat BRadley / Pablo Barrague vs Logan Martin / Matthew Hedstrom6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEric Bryerton / Christopher Raupp vs Todd Hochrein / Tim Grossman0-6, 1-6
2026-04-18vs FL - Lindhurst - Forest LakersLost 14
L#1 DoublesMatt Jones / Wesley Carson vs Samuel Tanner / Devin Lindhurst7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPat BRadley vs Marian Dic4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLloyd Raupp / Richard Sawyer vs Rick Aasen / Igor Shumilin1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesPablo Barrague vs Edward Furlow3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSwapnil Sonkusare / Christopher Raupp vs Gregory Parrish / Lindsay Ellis4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-04-13vs BHSC - Garriott - BaselinersLost 04
L#1 DoublesEric Bryerton / Matt Jones vs Todd Hochrein / Chris Stewart3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesPat BRadley vs Omar Garriott1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLloyd Raupp / Swapnil Sonkusare vs Michael Weiner / Matthew Reidenbach2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesWesley Carson vs Hans Gerling4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BHSC - Garriott - Baseliners71271328261
2FL - Lindhurst - Forest Lakers44192146334
3ACAC - Bryerton17142660415

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Wesley Carson
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Pat BRadley
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.36
Zane Broden
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Swapnil Sonkusare
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Pablo Barrague
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.07
Lloyd Raupp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Eric Bryerton
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.01
Christopher Raupp
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Richard Sawyer
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nathan Parow
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wesley Carson
5W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Pat BRadley
9W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.46
Zane Broden
4W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Swapnil Sonkusare
10W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Pablo Barrague
9W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lloyd Raupp
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Eric Bryerton
4W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Christopher Raupp
32W–84L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Richard Sawyer
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Nathan Parow
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.