Teams

SGV Warriors - Miller- Scholl Canyon/SA9

2022 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.08 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-19vs SGV Chic Netsetters-Garcia-WN/SU8Won 10
W#1 SinglesRebecca Escandon vs Sabrina Wedge6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRebecca Escandon vs Amy Newhall3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Hasquet / Victoria Smith vs Stephanie Perry / Ann Messana2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRebecca Escandon vs Penapa Frick6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Segal / Elyse Gainor vs Jane Caldito / MASAYO NOMURA6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesRebecca Escandon vs Amber Nuuvali6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElyse Gainor / Suzanne Segal vs Jennifer Miller / Shaheen Plunier6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesRebecca Escandon / Susan Miller vs Ching Chou / Charmaine Felix-Meyer6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Hasquet vs Alicia Villarino2-6, 3-6
2022-04-10vs SoCal/Tang/18&Over4.0WLost 02
L#1 SinglesRebecca Escandon vs Trisha Rickard7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSummer Shelton / Amy Hasquet vs Jane Wang / Jasmine Dai1-6, 0-6
2022-04-02vs SGV ATCC -Stahl Nix- ATCC-SA 1Won 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Hasquet / Summer Shelton vs Alma Banuelos / Darlene Parada6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRebecca Escandon vs Sarah Wong6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carrie Gan
published 4.5
3.97
Jing Lin
published
3.84
3.80
Rebecca Escandon
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.65
Jackie Steffen
published 4
3.62
Elyse Gainor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Amy Hasquet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Nichole Carlin
published
Nicole Keim
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carrie Gan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jing Lin
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Charanya Sivaraman
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Rebecca Escandon
158W–86L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Jackie Steffen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Elyse Gainor
46W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Amy Hasquet
92W–169L career · 4 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Nichole Carlin
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Keim
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.